IFPRI is committed to providing open access to the datasets that are generated during the research. These datasets are shared through Harvard Dataverse, an online open access repository. Browse or search our dataset collections using the search engine and the key fields, as shown below.
Agricultural Science and Technology Indicators (ASTI). Washington, DC 2014
Agricultural Science and Technology Indicators (ASTI). Washington, DC 2014
Agricultural Science and Technology Indicators (ASTI). Washington, DC 2014
Agricultural Science and Technology Indicators (ASTI). Washington, DC 2016
Agricultural Science and Technology Indicators (ASTI). Washington, DC 2016
Agricultural Science and Technology Indicators (ASTI). Washington, DC 2014
Agricultural Science and Technology Indicators (ASTI). Washington, DC 2018
Agricultural Science and Technology Indicators (ASTI). Washington, DC 2014
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2017
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2018
The dataset comprises information gathered from a baseline survey of farmer households in rural districts in southern Bangladesh. The sample was composed of 1,000 households primarily growing a food crop (mung bean) and 1,000 household growing a non-food crop (jute). The survey collected information on: demographics; agricultural production and marketing; assets, expenditures and consumption, and women’s empowerment in agriculture.
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2020
This dataset contains data from the final round of household survey interviews from the Impact Evaluation associated with the Bangladesh AVC project, which covered producer and input retailer households for two value chains. The sample is divided into five groups. Groups 1 through 3 refer to interviews along the jute value chain, while groups 4 and 5 refer to interviews along the mung bean value chain. Group 1 households are jute farmer households interviewed in 2016, 2017 and 2018. Group 2 households are jute farmer households interviewed in 2017 and 2018 (after expanding the original sample). Group 3 households are jute input retailers interviewed in 2017 and 2018. Group 4 households are mung bean farmer households interviewed in 2018. Group 5 households are mung bean input retailers interviewed in 2018.
Households completed two interview forms. A household-level form was administered to all households and included questions on household characteristics, agricultural production, and input purchases (or sales). An individual-level form was administered to male and female respondents, and included questions on household demographics and consumption. Group 2 households also completed a series of modules as part of the Project-Level Women’s Empowerment in Agriculture Index (Pro-WEAI).
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2019
This dataset contains data from the second round of household survey interviews from the impact evaluation of the Bangladesh AVC project. The dataset contains three respondent groups. Group 1 households are jute farmer households who were previously interviewed in 2016. Group 2 households are jute farmer households added to the sample at midline (2017). Group 3 households are local jute input retailers.
The dataset contains information on: household composition and socio-demographic characteristics of household members; agricultural production (including jute, other crops, input & labor usage, and agricultural practices used; relations with other value chain actors (input sellers); and household assets and expenditures on food and non-food items.
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2020
A&T is a six-year initiative to facilitate change for improved infant and young child feeding (IYCF) practices at scale in Bangladesh, Ethiopia, and Viet Nam. The goal of A&T is to reduce avoidable death and disability due to suboptimal IYCF in the developing world by increasing exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) until 6 months of age and reducing stunting of children 0-24 months of age.
In Bangladesh, A&T is working with the government, nongovernmental organizations, and private initiatives to support the implementation of the National IYCF Strategy and Action Plan. The BRAC organization is delivering A&T’s community interventions within its EHC Program and its Maternal, Neonatal, and Child Health (MNCH) Program. BRAC’s frontline health workers, known as Shasthya Shebika and Shasthya Kormi, delivered age-appropriate IYCF counseling and support services during home visits, antenatal and postnatal sessions, and health forums.
The baseline survey conducted as part of the impact evaluation of A&T interventions delivered through BRAC’s EHC platform had four components—(i) census, (ii) household survey, (iii) community survey, and (iv) frontline health workers survey. The census gathered data on household composition and child age, and was used to generate the sampling frame for the survey in the selected survey villages. The household survey captured the main impact indicators for A&T (WHO-recommended IYCF indicators and child anthropometry), use and exposure to A&T’s intervention platforms, and a variety of other data related to the use of the interventions. This included data on caregiver knowledge and perceptions about IYCF practices, challenges experienced in relation to IYCF practices, caregiver resources (such as education, childcare knowledge, and experience, and physical and mental health) and household resources (such as household composition, socioeconomic status, and food security). The community survey provided data on key community characteristics such as availability of infrastructure, availability, and access to education, health services, and healthcare providers. The frontline health worker survey gathered data on service provision by BRAC frontline health workers, traditional birth attendants (TBA), and village doctors. Data were also gathered on health worker time commitment, knowledge and attitude and training related to IYCF, and their job motivation, satisfaction, and supervision.
The data included here are from the survey of households. The survey was conducted in the 20upazilas across 13 districts in Bangladesh between April and August 2010 by the IFPRI team in collaboration with Data Analysis and Technical Assistance, Ltd. (DATA).
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2020
This dataset is the result of the frontline health worker (FLW) survey conducted to gather data at baseline as a part of an impact evaluation study of Alive & Thrive (A&T) interventions delivered through Building Resources Across Communities' (BRAC) Essential Health Care (EHC) Program in Bangladesh. The objective of the impact evaluation study is to evaluate the synergistic impact of A&T’s community component along with media communications and private sector activities such as the promotion and integration of micronutrient powders.
A&T is a six-year initiative to facilitate change for improved infant and young child feeding (IYCF) practices at scale in Bangladesh, Ethiopia, and Viet Nam. The goal of A&T is to reduce avoidable death and disability due to suboptimal IYCF in the developing world by increasing exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) until 6 months of age and reducing stunting of children 0-24 months of age.
In Bangladesh, A&T is working with the government, nongovernmental organizations, and private initiatives to support the implementation of the National IYCF Strategy and Action Plan. The BRAC organization is delivering A&T’s community interventions within its EHC Program and its Maternal, Neonatal, and Child Health (MNCH) Program. BRAC’s frontline health workers, known as Shasthya Shebika and Shasthya Kormi, delivered age-appropriate IYCF counseling and support services during home visits, antenatal and postnatal sessions, and health forums.
The baseline survey conducted as part of the impact evaluation of A&T interventions delivered through BRAC’s EHC platform had four components—(i) census, (ii) household survey, (iii) community survey, and (iv) frontline health workers survey. The census gathered data on household composition and child age, and was used to generate the sampling frame for the survey in the selected survey villages. The household survey captured the main impact indicators for A&T (WHO-recommended IYCF indicators and child anthropometry), use and exposure to A&T’s intervention platforms, and a variety of other data related to the use of the interventions. This included data on caregiver knowledge and perceptions about IYCF practices, challenges experienced in relation to IYCF practices, caregiver resources (such as education, childcare knowledge, and experience, and physical and mental health) and household resources (such as household composition, socioeconomic status, and food security). The community survey provided data on key community characteristics such as availability of infrastructure, availability, and access to education, health services, and healthcare providers. The frontline health worker survey gathered data on service provision by BRAC frontline health workers, traditional birth attendants (TBA), and village doctors. Data were also gathered on health worker time commitment, knowledge and attitude and training related to IYCF, and their job motivation, satisfaction, and supervision.
Two questionnaires were developed for frontline health workers survey—(i) Shasthya Shebika (SS) questionnaire, and (ii) Shasthya Kormi (SK) questionnaire. The data included here are from the survey of Shasthya Kormi. The survey was conducted in the 20 upazilas across 13 districts in Bangladesh between April and August 2010 by the IFPRI team in collaboration with Data Analysis and Technical Assistance, Ltd. (DATA).
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2020
This dataset is the result of the frontline health worker (FLW) survey conducted to gather data at baseline as a part of an impact evaluation study of Alive & Thrive (A&T) interventions delivered through Building Resources Across Communities' (BRAC) Essential Health Care (EHC) Program in Bangladesh. The objective of the impact evaluation study is to evaluate the synergistic impact of A&T’s community component along with media communications and private sector activities such as the promotion and integration of micronutrient powders.
A&T is a six-year initiative to facilitate change for improved infant and young child feeding (IYCF) practices at scale in Bangladesh, Ethiopia, and Viet Nam. The goal of A&T is to reduce avoidable death and disability due to suboptimal IYCF in the developing world by increasing exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) until 6 months of age and reducing stunting of children 0-24 months of age.
In Bangladesh, A&T is working with the government, nongovernmental organizations, and private initiatives to support the implementation of the National IYCF Strategy and Action Plan. The BRAC organization is delivering A&T’s community interventions within its EHC Program and its Maternal, Neonatal, and Child Health (MNCH) Program. BRAC’s frontline health workers, known as Shasthya Shebika and Shasthya Kormi, delivered age-appropriate IYCF counseling and support services during home visits, antenatal and postnatal sessions, and health forums.
The baseline survey conducted as part of the impact evaluation of A&T interventions delivered through BRAC’s EHC platform had four components—(i) census, (ii) household survey, (iii) community survey, and (iv) frontline health workers survey. The census gathered data on household composition and child age, and was used to generate the sampling frame for the survey in the selected survey villages. The household survey captured the main impact indicators for A&T (WHO-recommended IYCF indicators and child anthropometry), use and exposure to A&T’s intervention platforms, and a variety of other data related to the use of the interventions. This included data on caregiver knowledge and perceptions about IYCF practices, challenges experienced in relation to IYCF practices, caregiver resources (such as education, childcare knowledge, and experience, and physical and mental health) and household resources (such as household composition, socioeconomic status, and food security). The community survey provided data on key community characteristics such as availability of infrastructure, availability, and access to education, health services, and healthcare providers. The frontline health worker survey gathered data on service provision by BRAC frontline health workers, traditional birth attendants (TBA), and village doctors. Data were also gathered on health worker time commitment, knowledge and attitude and training related to IYCF, and their job motivation, satisfaction, and supervision.
Two questionnaires were developed for frontline health workers survey—(i) Shasthya Shebika (SS) questionnaire, and (ii) Shasthya Kormi (SK) questionnaire. The data included here are from the survey of Shasthya Shebika. The survey was conducted in the 20 upazilas across 13 districts in Bangladesh between April and August 2010 by the IFPRI team in collaboration with Data Analysis and Technical Assistance, Ltd. (DATA).
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2020
A&T is a six-year initiative to facilitate change for improved infant and young child feeding (IYCF) practices at scale in Bangladesh, Ethiopia, and Viet Nam. The goal of A&T is to reduce avoidable death and disability due to suboptimal IYCF in the developing world by increasing exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) until 6 months of age and reducing stunting of children 0-24 months of age.
In Bangladesh, A&T is working with the government, nongovernmental organizations, and private initiatives to support the implementation of the National IYCF Strategy and Action Plan. The BRAC organization is delivering A&T’s community interventions within its EHC Program and its Maternal, Neonatal, and Child Health (MNCH) Program. BRAC’s frontline health workers, known as Shasthya Shebika and Shasthya Kormi, delivered age-appropriate IYCF counseling and support services during home visits, antenatal and postnatal sessions, and health forums.
The endline survey conducted as part of the impact evaluation of A&T interventions delivered through BRAC’s EHC platform had three components—(i) household survey, (ii) community survey, and (iii) frontline health workers survey. The household survey captured the main impact indicators for A&T (WHO-recommended IYCF indicators and child anthropometry), use and exposure to A&T’s intervention platforms, and a variety of other data related to the use of the interventions. This included data on caregiver knowledge and perceptions about IYCF practices, challenges experienced in relation to IYCF practices, caregiver resources (such as education, childcare knowledge, and experience, and physical and mental health) and household resources (such as household composition, socioeconomic status, and food security). The endline household survey was developed using the baseline evaluation questionnaires as a base, and adapted to capture key program activities, particularly with regards to the use of A&T community services and exposure to mass media. The community survey provided data on key community characteristics such as availability of infrastructure, availability, and access to education, health services, and healthcare providers. The frontline health worker survey gathered data on service provision by BRAC frontline health workers, traditional birth attendants (TBA), and village doctors. Data were also gathered on health worker time commitment, knowledge and attitude and training related to IYCF, and their job motivation, satisfaction, and supervision.
The data included here are from the survey of households. The survey was conducted in the 20 upazilas across 10 districts in Bangladesh between April and June 2014 by the IFPRI team in collaboration with Data Analysis and Technical Assistance, Ltd. (DATA).
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2020
A&T is a six-year initiative to facilitate change for improved infant and young child feeding (IYCF) practices at scale in Bangladesh, Ethiopia, and Viet Nam. The goal of A&T is to reduce avoidable death and disability due to suboptimal IYCF in the developing world by increasing exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) until 6 months of age and reducing stunting of children 0-24 months of age.
In Bangladesh, A&T is working with the government, nongovernmental organizations, and private initiatives to support the implementation of the National IYCF Strategy and Action Plan. The BRAC organization is delivering A&T’s community interventions within its EHC Program and its Maternal, Neonatal, and Child Health (MNCH) Program. BRAC’s frontline health workers, known as Shasthya Shebika and Shasthya Kormi, delivered age-appropriate IYCF counseling and support services during home visits, antenatal and postnatal sessions, and health forums.
The endline survey conducted as part of the impact evaluation of A&T interventions delivered through BRAC’s EHC platform had three components—(i) household survey, (ii) community survey, and (iii) frontline health workers survey. The household survey captured the main impact indicators for A&T (WHO-recommended IYCF indicators and child anthropometry), use and exposure to A&T’s intervention platforms, and a variety of other data related to the use of the interventions. This included data on caregiver knowledge and perceptions about IYCF practices, challenges experienced in relation to IYCF practices, caregiver resources (such as education, childcare knowledge, and experience, and physical and mental health) and household resources (such as household composition, socioeconomic status, and food security). The endline household survey was developed using the baseline evaluation questionnaires as a base, and adapted to capture key program activities, particularly with regards to the use of A&T community services and exposure to mass media. The community survey provided data on key community characteristics such as availability of infrastructure, availability, and access to education, health services, and healthcare providers. The frontline health worker survey gathered data on service provision by BRAC frontline health workers, traditional birth attendants (TBA), and village doctors. Data were also gathered on health worker time commitment, knowledge and attitude and training related to IYCF, and their job motivation, satisfaction, and supervision.
Three questionnaires were developed for frontline health workers survey—(i) Shasthya Shebika (SS) questionnaire, (ii) Shasthya Kormi (SK) questionnaire, and (iii) Pushti Kormi questionnaire. The data included here are from the survey of Pushti Kormi. The survey was conducted in the 20 upazilas across 10 districts in Bangladesh between April and June 2014 by the IFPRI team in collaboration with Data Analysis and Technical Assistance, Ltd. (DATA).
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2020
A&T is a six-year initiative to facilitate change for improved infant and young child feeding (IYCF) practices at scale in Bangladesh, Ethiopia, and Viet Nam. The goal of A&T is to reduce avoidable death and disability due to suboptimal IYCF in the developing world by increasing exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) until 6 months of age and reducing stunting of children 0-24 months of age.
In Bangladesh, A&T is working with the government, nongovernmental organizations, and private initiatives to support the implementation of the National IYCF Strategy and Action Plan. The BRAC organization is delivering A&T’s community interventions within its EHC Program and its Maternal, Neonatal, and Child Health (MNCH) Program. BRAC’s frontline health workers, known as Shasthya Shebika and Shasthya Kormi, delivered age-appropriate IYCF counseling and support services during home visits, antenatal and postnatal sessions, and health forums.
The endline survey conducted as part of the impact evaluation of A&T interventions delivered through BRAC’s EHC platform had three components—(i) household survey, (ii) community survey, and (iii) frontline health workers survey. The household survey captured the main impact indicators for A&T (WHO-recommended IYCF indicators and child anthropometry), use and exposure to A&T’s intervention platforms, and a variety of other data related to the use of the interventions. This included data on caregiver knowledge and perceptions about IYCF practices, challenges experienced in relation to IYCF practices, caregiver resources (such as education, childcare knowledge, and experience, and physical and mental health) and household resources (such as household composition, socioeconomic status, and food security). The endline household survey was developed using the baseline evaluation questionnaires as a base, and adapted to capture key program activities, particularly with regards to the use of A&T community services and exposure to mass media. The community survey provided data on key community characteristics such as availability of infrastructure, availability, and access to education, health services, and healthcare providers. The frontline health worker survey gathered data on service provision by BRAC frontline health workers, traditional birth attendants (TBA), and village doctors. Data were also gathered on health worker time commitment, knowledge and attitude and training related to IYCF, and their job motivation, satisfaction, and supervision.
Three questionnaires were developed for frontline health workers survey—(i) Shasthya Shebika (SS) questionnaire, (ii) Shasthya Kormi (SK) questionnaire, and (iii) Pushti Kormi questionnaire. The data included here are from the survey of Shasthya Kormi. The survey was conducted in the 20 upazilas across 10 districts in Bangladesh between April and June 2014 by the IFPRI team in collaboration with Data Analysis and Technical Assistance, Ltd. (DATA).
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2020
A&T is a six-year initiative to facilitate change for improved infant and young child feeding (IYCF) practices at scale in Bangladesh, Ethiopia, and Viet Nam. The goal of A&T is to reduce avoidable death and disability due to suboptimal IYCF in the developing world by increasing exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) until 6 months of age and reducing stunting of children 0-24 months of age.
In Bangladesh, A&T is working with the government, nongovernmental organizations, and private initiatives to support the implementation of the National IYCF Strategy and Action Plan. The BRAC organization is delivering A&T’s community interventions within its EHC Program and its Maternal, Neonatal, and Child Health (MNCH) Program. BRAC’s frontline health workers, known as Shasthya Shebika and Shasthya Kormi, delivered age-appropriate IYCF counseling and support services during home visits, antenatal and postnatal sessions, and health forums.
The endline survey conducted as part of the impact evaluation of A&T interventions delivered through BRAC’s EHC platform had three components—(i) household survey, (ii) community survey, and (iii) frontline health workers survey. The household survey captured the main impact indicators for A&T (WHO-recommended IYCF indicators and child anthropometry), use and exposure to A&T’s intervention platforms, and a variety of other data related to the use of the interventions. This included data on caregiver knowledge and perceptions about IYCF practices, challenges experienced in relation to IYCF practices, caregiver resources (such as education, childcare knowledge, and experience, and physical and mental health) and household resources (such as household composition, socioeconomic status, and food security). The endline household survey was developed using the baseline evaluation questionnaires as a base, and adapted to capture key program activities, particularly with regards to the use of A&T community services and exposure to mass media. The community survey provided data on key community characteristics such as availability of infrastructure, availability, and access to education, health services, and healthcare providers. The frontline health worker survey gathered data on service provision by BRAC frontline health workers, traditional birth attendants (TBA), and village doctors. Data were also gathered on health worker time commitment, knowledge and attitude and training related to IYCF, and their job motivation, satisfaction, and supervision.
Three questionnaires were developed for frontline health workers survey—(i) Shasthya Shebika (SS) questionnaire, (ii) Shasthya Kormi (SK) questionnaire, and (iii) Pushti Kormi questionnaire. The data included here are from the survey of Shasthya Shebika. The survey was conducted in the 20 upazilas across 10 districts in Bangladesh between April and June 2014 by the IFPRI team in collaboration with Data Analysis and Technical Assistance, Ltd. (DATA).
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2020
A&T is a six-year initiative to facilitate change for improved infant and young child feeding (IYCF) practices at scale in Bangladesh, Ethiopia, and Viet Nam. The goal of A&T is to reduce avoidable death and disability due to suboptimal IYCF in the developing world by increasing exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) until 6 months of age and reducing stunting of children 0-24 months of age.
In Bangladesh, A&T is working with the government, nongovernmental organizations, and private initiatives to support the implementation of the National IYCF Strategy and Action Plan. The BRAC organization is delivering A&T’s community interventions within its EHC Program and its Maternal, Neonatal, and Child Health (MNCH) Program. BRAC’s frontline health workers, known as Shasthya Shebika and Shasthya Kormi, delivered age-appropriate IYCF counseling and support services during home visits, antenatal and postnatal sessions, and health forums.
The process evaluation survey conducted as part of the impact evaluation of A&T interventions delivered through BRAC’s EHC platform had two components—(i) household survey, and (ii) frontline health workers survey. The household survey captured the main impact indicators for A&T (WHO-recommended IYCF indicators and child anthropometry), use and exposure to A&T’s intervention platforms, and a variety of other data related to the use of the interventions. This included data on caregiver knowledge and perceptions about IYCF practices, challenges experienced in relation to IYCF practices, caregiver resources (such as education, childcare knowledge, and experience, and physical and mental health) and household resources (such as household composition, socioeconomic status, and food security). The frontline health worker survey gathered data on service provision by BRAC frontline health workers, traditional birth attendants (TBA), and village doctors. Data were also gathered on health worker time commitment, knowledge and attitude and training related to IYCF, complementary feeding, sanitation and hygiene practices, and their job supervision and contact with other workers; their knowledge and skills about Pustikona.
The data included here are from the survey of households. The survey was conducted in the 25 upazilas across 13 districts in Bangladesh between April and August 2013 by the IFPRI team in collaboration with Data Analysis and Technical Assistance, Ltd. (DATA).
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2020
A&T is a six-year initiative to facilitate change for improved infant and young child feeding (IYCF) practices at scale in Bangladesh, Ethiopia, and Viet Nam. The goal of A&T is to reduce avoidable death and disability due to suboptimal IYCF in the developing world by increasing exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) until 6 months of age and reducing stunting of children 0-24 months of age.
In Bangladesh, A&T is working with the government, nongovernmental organizations, and private initiatives to support the implementation of the National IYCF Strategy and Action Plan. The BRAC organization is delivering A&T’s community interventions within its EHC Program and its Maternal, Neonatal, and Child Health (MNCH) Program. BRAC’s frontline health workers, known as Shasthya Shebika and Shasthya Kormi, delivered age-appropriate IYCF counseling and support services during home visits, antenatal and postnatal sessions, and health forums.
The process evaluation survey conducted as part of the impact evaluation of A&T interventions delivered through BRAC’s EHC platform had two components—(i) household survey, and (ii) frontline health workers survey. The household survey captured the main impact indicators for A&T (WHO-recommended IYCF indicators and child anthropometry), use and exposure to A&T’s intervention platforms, and a variety of other data related to the use of the interventions. This included data on caregiver knowledge and perceptions about IYCF practices, challenges experienced in relation to IYCF practices, caregiver resources (such as education, childcare knowledge, and experience, and physical and mental health) and household resources (such as household composition, socioeconomic status, and food security). The frontline health worker survey gathered data on service provision by BRAC frontline health workers, traditional birth attendants (TBA), and village doctors. Data were also gathered on health worker time commitment, knowledge and attitude and training related to IYCF, complementary feeding, sanitation and hygiene practices, and their job supervision and contact with other workers; their knowledge and skills about Pustikona.
Three questionnaires were developed for frontline health workers survey—(i) Shasthya Shebika (SS) questionnaire, (ii) Shasthya Kormi (SK) questionnaire, and (iii) Pushti Kormi questionnaire. The data included here are from the survey of Pushti Kormi. The survey was conducted in the 25 upazilas across 13 districts in Bangladesh between April and August 2013 by the IFPRI team in collaboration with Data Analysis and Technical Assistance, Ltd. (DATA).
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2020
A&T is a six-year initiative to facilitate change for improved infant and young child feeding (IYCF) practices at scale in Bangladesh, Ethiopia, and Viet Nam. The goal of A&T is to reduce avoidable death and disability due to suboptimal IYCF in the developing world by increasing exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) until 6 months of age and reducing stunting of children 0-24 months of age.
In Bangladesh, A&T is working with the government, nongovernmental organizations, and private initiatives to support the implementation of the National IYCF Strategy and Action Plan. The BRAC organization is delivering A&T’s community interventions within its EHC Program and its Maternal, Neonatal, and Child Health (MNCH) Program. BRAC’s frontline health workers, known as Shasthya Shebika and Shasthya Kormi, delivered age-appropriate IYCF counseling and support services during home visits, antenatal and postnatal sessions, and health forums.
The process evaluation survey conducted as part of the impact evaluation of A&T interventions delivered through BRAC’s EHC platform had two components—(i) household survey, and (ii) frontline health workers survey. The household survey captured the main impact indicators for A&T (WHO-recommended IYCF indicators and child anthropometry), use and exposure to A&T’s intervention platforms, and a variety of other data related to the use of the interventions. This included data on caregiver knowledge and perceptions about IYCF practices, challenges experienced in relation to IYCF practices, caregiver resources (such as education, childcare knowledge, and experience, and physical and mental health) and household resources (such as household composition, socioeconomic status, and food security). The frontline health worker survey gathered data on service provision by BRAC frontline health workers, traditional birth attendants (TBA), and village doctors. Data were also gathered on health worker time commitment, knowledge and attitude and training related to IYCF, complementary feeding, sanitation and hygiene practices, and their job supervision and contact with other workers; their knowledge and skills about Pustikona.
Three questionnaires were developed for frontline health workers survey—(i) Shasthya Shebika (SS) questionnaire, (ii) Shasthya Kormi (SK) questionnaire, and (iii) Pushti Kormi questionnaire. The data included here are from the survey of Shasthya Kormi. The survey was conducted in the 25 upazilas across 13 districts in Bangladesh between April and August 2013 by the IFPRI team in collaboration with Data Analysis and Technical Assistance, Ltd. (DATA).
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2020
A&T is a six-year initiative to facilitate change for improved infant and young child feeding (IYCF) practices at scale in Bangladesh, Ethiopia, and Viet Nam. The goal of A&T is to reduce avoidable death and disability due to suboptimal IYCF in the developing world by increasing exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) until 6 months of age and reducing stunting of children 0-24 months of age.
In Bangladesh, A&T is working with the government, nongovernmental organizations, and private initiatives to support the implementation of the National IYCF Strategy and Action Plan. The BRAC organization is delivering A&T’s community interventions within its EHC Program and its Maternal, Neonatal, and Child Health (MNCH) Program. BRAC’s frontline health workers, known as Shasthya Shebika and Shasthya Kormi, delivered age-appropriate IYCF counseling and support services during home visits, antenatal and postnatal sessions, and health forums.
The process evaluation survey conducted as part of the impact evaluation of A&T interventions delivered through BRAC’s EHC platform had two components—(i) household survey, and (ii) frontline health workers survey. The household survey captured the main impact indicators for A&T (WHO-recommended IYCF indicators and child anthropometry), use and exposure to A&T’s intervention platforms, and a variety of other data related to the use of the interventions. This included data on caregiver knowledge and perceptions about IYCF practices, challenges experienced in relation to IYCF practices, caregiver resources (such as education, childcare knowledge, and experience, and physical and mental health) and household resources (such as household composition, socioeconomic status, and food security). The frontline health worker survey gathered data on service provision by BRAC frontline health workers, traditional birth attendants (TBA), and village doctors. Data were also gathered on health worker time commitment, knowledge and attitude and training related to IYCF, complementary feeding, sanitation and hygiene practices, and their job supervision and contact with other workers; their knowledge and skills about Pustikona.
Three questionnaires were developed for frontline health workers survey—(i) Shasthya Shebika (SS) questionnaire, (ii) Shasthya Kormi (SK) questionnaire, and (iii) Pushti Kormi questionnaire. The data included here are from the survey of Shasthya Shebika. The survey was conducted in the 25 upazilas across 13 districts in Bangladesh between April and August 2013 by the IFPRI team in collaboration with Data Analysis and Technical Assistance, Ltd. (DATA).
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI); Data Analysis and Technical Assistance (DATA); Center for Development Research (ZEF), University of Bonn. Washington, DC 2014
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI); Data Analysis and Technical Assistance (DATA); Center for Development Research (ZEF), University of Bonn. Washington, DC 2014
Washington, D.C. 2002
Ahmed, Akhter. Washington, DC 2013
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2016
The first round of survey can be accessed at http://hdl.handle.net/1902.1/21266.
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2020
Washington, D.C. 2009
Washington, D.C. 2003
Washington, D.C. 2001
International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT). Washington, DC 2015
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) . Washington, DC 2015
In the face of this problem, United States Agency for International Development (USAID) through the Feed the Future (FTF) initiative is supporting the development of a program for input quality assurance called e-verification (EV). E-verification involves labeling genuine agricultural inputs with a scratch-off label that provides an authentication code that can be used to confirm that the labeled product is genuine. Given the potential importance of this initiative, USAID is funding an independent impact evaluation of the effectiveness of the EV system at improving adoption of high-quality inputs and reducing the prevalence of counterfeiting. The impact evaluation will estimate the impact of the e-verification scheme on each of these outcomes and will examine how the e-verification project achieved its results.
To undertake the impact evaluation, IFPRI conducted a baseline survey of communities, shops, and households. This survey resulted in the dataset contained in this study. The team identified ten major maize growing regions, termed market hubs, which covered districts (and surroundings) of Hoima, Iganga, Kasese, Kiboga, Luwero, Masaka, Masindi, Mbale, Mityana, and Mubende. Within these market hubs, the study sampled 120 market locations (trading centres or collections of shops) from which households source agricultural inputs. Within each market location, a matched pair of two villages was sampled. The baseline survey was targeted towards ten households in each of the 240 villages (LC1s). The sample ultimately resulted in 2,378 households being surveyed. The study is designed to measure the impact of e-verification interventions on glyphosate herbicide, hybrid maize seed and inorganic fertilizer. Glyphosate herbicide is expected to be the first input released through the e-verification scheme.
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) . Washington, DC 2015
In the face of this problem, United States Agency for International Development (USAID) through the Feed the Future (FTF) initiative is supporting the development of a program for input quality assurance called e-verification (EV). E-verification involves labeling genuine agricultural inputs with a scratch-off label that provides an authentication code that can be used to confirm that the labeled product is genuine. Given the potential importance of this initiative, USAID is funding an independent impact evaluation of the effectiveness of the EV system at improving adoption of high-quality inputs and reducing the prevalence of counterfeiting. The impact evaluation will estimate the impact of the e-verification scheme on each of these outcomes and will examine how the e-verification project achieved its results.
To undertake the impact evaluation, IFPRI conducted a baseline survey of communities, shops, and households. This survey resulted in the dataset contained in this study. The team identified ten major maize growing regions, termed market hubs, which covered districts (and surroundings) of Hoima, Iganga, Kasese, Kiboga, Luwero, Masaka, Masindi, Mbale, Mityana, and Mubende. Within these market hubs, the study sampled 120 market locations (trading centres or collections of shops) from which households source agricultural inputs. Within each market location, a matched pair of two villages was sampled. The baseline survey was targeted towards ten households in each of the 240 villages (LC1s). The sample ultimately resulted in 2,378 households being surveyed. The study is designed to measure the impact of e-verification interventions on glyphosate herbicide, hybrid maize seed and inorganic fertilizer. Glyphosate herbicide is expected to be the first input released through the e-verification scheme.
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) . Washington, DC 2015
In the face of this problem, United States Agency for International Development (USAID) through the Feed the Future (FTF) initiative is supporting the development of a program for input quality assurance called e-verification (EV). E-verification involves labeling genuine agricultural inputs with a scratch-off label that provides an authentication code that can be used to confirm that the labeled product is genuine. Given the potential importance of this initiative, USAID is funding an independent impact evaluation of the effectiveness of the EV system at improving adoption of high-quality inputs and reducing the prevalence of counterfeiting. The impact evaluation will estimate the impact of the e-verification scheme on each of these outcomes and will examine how the e-verification project achieved its results.
To undertake the impact evaluation, IFPRI conducted a baseline survey of communities, shops, and households. This survey resulted in the dataset contained in this study. The team identified ten major maize growing regions, termed market hubs, which covered districts (and surroundings) of Hoima, Iganga, Kasese, Kiboga, Luwero, Masaka, Masindi, Mbale, Mityana, and Mubende. Within these market hubs, the study sampled 120 market locations (trading centres or collections of shops) from which households source agricultural inputs. Within each market location, a matched pair of two villages was sampled. The baseline survey was targeted towards ten households in each of the 240 villages (LC1s). The sample ultimately resulted in 2,378 households being surveyed. The study is designed to measure the impact of e-verification interventions on glyphosate herbicide, hybrid maize seed and inorganic fertilizer. Glyphosate herbicide is expected to be the first input released through the e-verification scheme.
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) . Washington, DC 2015
In the face of this problem, United States Agency for International Development (USAID) through the Feed the Future (FTF) initiative is supporting the development of a program for input quality assurance called e-verification (EV). E-verification involves labeling genuine agricultural inputs with a scratch-off label that provides an authentication code that can be used to confirm that the labeled product is genuine. Given the potential importance of this initiative, USAID is funding an independent impact evaluation of the effectiveness of the EV system at improving adoption of high-quality inputs and reducing the prevalence of counterfeiting. The impact evaluation will estimate the impact of the e-verification scheme on each of these outcomes and will examine how the e-verification project achieved its results.
To undertake the impact evaluation, IFPRI conducted a baseline survey of communities, shops, and households. This survey resulted in the dataset contained in this study. The team identified ten major maize growing regions, termed market hubs, which covered districts (and surroundings) of Hoima, Iganga, Kasese, Kiboga, Luwero, Masaka, Masindi, Mbale, Mityana, and Mubende. Within these market hubs, the study sampled 120 market locations (trading centres or collections of shops) from which households source agricultural inputs. Within each market location, a matched pair of two villages was sampled. The baseline survey was targeted towards ten households in each of the 240 villages (LC1s). The sample ultimately resulted in 2,378 households being surveyed. The study is designed to measure the impact of e-verification interventions on glyphosate herbicide, hybrid maize seed and inorganic fertilizer. Glyphosate herbicide is expected to be the first input released through the e-verification scheme.
Washington, D.C. 2004
International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI). Washington, DC 2014
World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF); Sokoine University of Agriculture (SUA). Washington, DC 2021
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2005
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI); Inter-American Development Bank (IDB); Institute for Advanced Development Studies (INESAD); Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW). Washington, DC 2015
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2014
Washington, D.C. 2003
Washington, D.C. 1994
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2021
Breakeven installed cost calculated under reference diesel fuel price scenario (price escalation rate=2%);
Breakeven installed cost calculated under high diesel fuel price scenario (price escalation rate=4%);
Breakeven installed cost calculated under low diesel fuel price scenario (price escalation rate=0).
International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA); International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI). Washington, DC 2021
Washington, DC 2006
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2018
The objective of this survey is to capture within-site variability on key livelihood indicators that could be used for a range of analysis including the modelling of impact of adaptation and mitigation strategies on livelihoods, food security and the environment. The survey was carried out in 13 other benchmark sites across East Africa, West Africa, and South Asia. IMPACT Lite data from Satkhira, Bangladesh were collected by IFPRI as part of the IFPRI-CCAFS Gender and Climate Change Survey Data.
HarvestChoice, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI); University of Minnesota. Washington, D.C. 2016
HarvestChoice, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI); International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT). Washington, DC 2017
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2022
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2022
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2021
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2021
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2021
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2022
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2022
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2022
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2022
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2022
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2022
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2022
Pede, Valerien O.; Krishna, Vijesh; Teufel, Nils; Ward, Patrick S.; Yamano, Takashi; Sammadar, Arindam; Spielman, David J.; Mittal, Surabhi; Paris, Thelma; Singh, Dhiraj; Singh, Vartika; Ghimire, Subhash; Mehrotra, Meerah. Los Baños, Philippines; Washington, DC; Mexico, DF, Mexico; Nairobi, Kenya 2013
International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI). Washington, DC 2018
Washington, D.C. 2005
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2019
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2019
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2019
Washington, D.C. 2004
Agnes Quisumbing; Bob Baulch. Washington, D.C. 2010
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI); Ghana Cocoa Board (COCOBOD). Washington, DC; Accra, Ghana; 2014
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI);
Ethiopian Development Research Institute (EDRI). Washington, DC 2020
International Potato Center (CIP). Washington, DC 2015
International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI). Washington, DC 2015
Washington, D.C. 2010
International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT); Zambian Agriculture Research Institute (ZARI). Washington, DC 2020
International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT); Zambian Agriculture Research Institute (ZARI); Total LandCare (TLC). Washington, DC 2019
International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT); Zambian Agriculture Research Institute (ZARI) ;Total LandCare (TLC). Washington, DC 2021
International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT). Washington, DC 2020
International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT). Washington, DC 2021
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC; 2018
International Potato Center (CIP). Washington, DC 2015
Washington, D.C. 2005
International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA); Savanna Agricultural Research Institute (SARI). Washington, DC 2015
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI);
Ghent University;
University of Manchester. Washington, DC 2020
International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI). Washington, DC 2014
World Vegetable Center (AVRDC). Washington, DC 2016
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI); The World Bank; Mama's Hope Organization for Legal Assistance (MHOLA); Government of Mozambique. Washington, DC 2019
In the Tanzania project, expenditures were recorded at the district level of the two intervention districts, such that the intervention cost can be measured separately for each district. Some types of costs that were more centralized and were not direct field outlays were assigned to the central project office in Bukoba. The spatial details of costs are richer and more complex in the Mozambique program. Costs at the lowest (community) level center around goods and services directly provided to contact farmers. The most significant costs at the administrative post level are those associated directly with extension officers, of which two are deployed in each post. At the district level, the program put in place a district facilitator and an environmental specialist to attend to various aspects of the project. Central costs include all the expenses of compensation of non-field-project staff for them to design and conduct the program, their travel costs to get to the field sites, capital outlays such as for vehicles, and various operational expenditures.
Department of Food, Nutrition and Health, The University of British Columbia;
HarvestPlus, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2020
In this cross-sectional survey, 744 mother-child pairs were recruited using a probability proportionate to size (PPS) sampling method in select health zones of South Kivu and the rural district of Lukaya in Kongo Central, DRC between June and October 2014. This dataset includes information on household's socio-economic characteristics; water, sanitation and hygiene practices; child health and health-seeking behavior; and consumption of bean.
Anthropometric measurements were taken by trained personnel using the Food and Nutrition Technical Assistance (FANTA) Anthropometric Indicators Measurement Guide.
International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI). Washington, DC 2015
International Potato Center (CIP). Washington, DC 2014
International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA); HarvestPlus of International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2015
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2020
The survey is split into 9 modules:
1. Location (LN) – preliminary characteristics of the location where the DDA is employed; the gender of the respondent is also recorded in this module
2. General Information (ID) – basic demographic and educational background, as well as the length of time the director has served in the MMDA
3. Employment History (EH) – details on the current job, number of previous jobs, district location of previous jobs, job experiences, and aspirations within the civil service
4. Agricultural Planning and Implementation (AP) – questions related to the agricultural planning process within the district
5. Agricultural Budgets and Expenditures (AB) – details on the agricultural budgeting and expenditure process
6. Engagement with the District Assembly (DA) – questions related to directors’ relationship with the other sectoral departments of the MMDA
7. Devolution Transition Process (DT) –details about the 2012 devolution transition process and the perceived challenges and opportunities that emerged from that reform
8. Staffing and Resources (SR) – opinions and perspectives of the directors on the staffing and resource availability in their offices
9. Final Section (FI) – enumerator observations
International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI). Washington, DC 2021
International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI); Association Malienne d'Eveil au D?veloppement Durable (AMEDD). Washington, DC 2017
International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT); Zambian Agriculture Research Institute (ZARI); Total LandCare (TLC). Washington, DC 2019
World Agroforestry Center (ICRAF); University of California (UC), Davis. Washington, DC 2021
HarvestChoice. Washington, DC; St. Paul, MN 1995
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2019
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2019
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2019
International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI). Washington, DC 2019
Ruel, Marie T.;. 2002
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2021
Ministry of Agriculture, Irrigation and Water Development; Lilongwe University of Agriculture & Natural Resources (LUANAR); Michigan State University (MSU). Washington, DC 2017
Washington, D.C. 2000
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI); Central Agency for Public Mobilization and Statistics (CAPMAS), Arab Republic of Egypt. Washington, DC 2016
Washington, D.C. 2000
Washington, D.C. 2000
Washington, D.C. 1998
Washington, D.C. 2000
Rawat, Rahul; Smith, Erin. 2014
International Water Management Institute (IWMI); International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT). Washington, DC 2018
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2020
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2016
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2020
A&T is a six-year initiative to facilitate change for improved infant and young child feeding (IYCF) practices at scale in Bangladesh, Ethiopia, and Viet Nam. The goal of A&T is to reduce avoidable death and disability due to suboptimal IYCF in the developing world by increasing exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) until 6 months of age and reducing stunting of children 0-24 months of age.
The Ethiopia baseline survey had two broad objectives. The first objective was to gather data on the primary impact indicators of the evaluation, prior to implementation of any A&T interventions, to establish a baseline against which changes would be measured. The second objective was to assess different factors that may influence the outcomes of interest, and thus shape the impact of the primary impact indicators. These factors were determined at five different levels: 1) child, 2) maternal/caregiver, 3) household, 4) community, 5) health care providers, 6) health system. These factors will also provide useful information to interpret the results of the impact evaluation and also signal key issues to pay attention to in the process evaluation.
The Ethiopia baseline survey used five separate questionnaires that aimed to capture elements along the program impact pathways. These tools include 1) a household questionnaire, 2) a staff questionnaire of HEWs, 3) a staff questionnaire of supervisors of HEWs, 4) a VCHP), and 5) a community questionnaire.
The community questionnaire provided information on the following: 1) general characteristics of the cluster: population, number of households’ languages, livelihood, season of food shortage, topography; 2) infrastructure: access to main road (both during dry and rainy season), electricity, access to clean water; 3) distance from the nearest major town, type of transportation used to reach this town; 4) access to the nearest market; 5) migration pattern; 6) social and food assistance, such as presence of productive safety net program, community-based nutrition program, etc.; 7) natural disaster occurring in the area during the three years before the survey; 8) availability and access to health services: health post, government hospital, private clinic, etc.; 9) availability of education facility: junior and high school, college.
The community questionnaire was administered to a group of community members to gather information on the contextual factors related to each community as well as to understand differences in community characteristics across the clusters (enumeration areas (EA)). This information at the community level is critical to control for externalities that could influence the outcome of the program.
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2020
A&T is a six-year initiative to facilitate change for improved infant and young child feeding (IYCF) practices at scale in Bangladesh, Ethiopia, and Viet Nam. The goal of A&T is to reduce avoidable death and disability due to suboptimal IYCF in the developing world by increasing exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) until 6 months of age and reducing stunting of children 0-24 months of age.
The Ethiopia baseline survey had two broad objectives. The first objective was to gather data on the primary impact indicators of the evaluation, prior to implementation of any A&T interventions, to establish a baseline against which changes would be measured. The second objective was to assess different factors that may influence the outcomes of interest, and thus shape the impact of the primary impact indicators. These factors were determined at five different levels: 1) child, 2) maternal/caregiver, 3) household, 4) community, 5) health care providers, 6) health system. These factors will also provide useful information to interpret the results of the impact evaluation and also signal key issues to pay attention to in the process evaluation.
The Ethiopia baseline survey used five separate questionnaires that aimed to capture elements along the program impact pathways. These tools include 1) a household questionnaire, 2) a staff questionnaire of health extension workers (HEW), 3) a staff questionnaire of supervisors of HEWs, 4) a volunteer community health promoters (VCHP), and 5) a community questionnaire.
Three types of health staff questionnaires (HEW, VCHP, and supervisors) were applied to health staff who are closest to the community or work in the community.
In the Health Extension Program (HEP), the key frontline health workers (FHWs) are the health extension workers (HEWs).
The health extension workers (HEW) questionnaire (along with the other two health workers questionnaires (VCHP and supervisors)) aimed at assessing three major issues: 1) frequency of interactions between health staff and caregivers, and avenues for these interactions; 2) content of the discussion between caregivers and health staff, and the time spent on IYCF-related discussions; and 3) knowledge and training received by the health staff on IYCF. In addition, the frontline health worker questionnaires capture the organizational context within which FHWs deliver their interventions. These are captured by inclusion of questions on perceptions related to their workload and their level of satisfaction with their overall job. This is particularly important to capture volunteer workers who receive no salary.
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2020
A&T is a six-year initiative to facilitate change for improved infant and young child feeding (IYCF) practices at scale in Bangladesh, Ethiopia, and Viet Nam. The goal of A&T is to reduce avoidable death and disability due to suboptimal IYCF in the developing world by increasing exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) until 6 months of age and reducing stunting of children 0-24 months of age.
The Ethiopia baseline survey had two broad objectives. The first objective was to gather data on the primary impact indicators of the evaluation, prior to implementation of any A&T interventions, to establish a baseline against which changes would be measured. The second objective was to assess different factors that may influence the outcomes of interest, and thus shape the impact of the primary impact indicators. These factors were determined at five different levels: 1) child, 2) maternal/caregiver, 3) household, 4) community, 5) health care providers, 6) health system. These factors will also provide useful information to interpret the results of the impact evaluation and also signal key issues to pay attention to in the process evaluation.
The Ethiopia baseline survey used five separate questionnaires that aimed to capture elements along the program impact pathways. These tools include 1) a household questionnaire, 2) a staff questionnaire of HEWs, 3) a staff questionnaire of supervisors of HEWs, 4) a VCHP), and 5) a community questionnaire.
The household questionnaire in Ethiopia consisted of 14 different modules covering a wide range of information both for assessing the outcomes of interests as well as factors that influence the uptake and adoption of A&T interventions, such as household food security, socioeconomic status, parental characteristics, maternal knowledge and skills about IYCF, exposure to A&T and other IYCF/nutrition interventions, exposure to media, household gender relationships, and child characteristics, e.g., age, gender, perceptions about size and birth. The questions are largely based on previously validated questions or modules.
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2020
A&T is a six-year initiative to facilitate change for improved infant and young child feeding (IYCF) practices at scale in Bangladesh, Ethiopia, and Viet Nam. The goal of A&T is to reduce avoidable death and disability due to suboptimal IYCF in the developing world by increasing exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) until 6 months of age and reducing stunting of children 0-24 months of age.
The Ethiopia baseline survey had two broad objectives. The first objective was to gather data on the primary impact indicators of the evaluation, prior to implementation of any A&T interventions, to establish a baseline against which changes would be measured. The second objective was to assess different factors that may influence the outcomes of interest, and thus shape the impact of the primary impact indicators. These factors were determined at five different levels: 1) child, 2) maternal/caregiver, 3) household, 4) community, 5) health care providers, 6) health system. These factors will also provide useful information to interpret the results of the impact evaluation and also signal key issues to pay attention to in the process evaluation.
The Ethiopia baseline survey used five separate questionnaires that aimed to capture elements along the program impact pathways. These tools include 1) a household questionnaire, 2) a staff questionnaire of HEWs, 3) a staff questionnaire of supervisors of HEWs, 4) a VCHP), and 5) a community questionnaire.
Three types of health staff questionnaires (HEW, VCHP, and supervisors) applied to health staff who are closest to the community or work in the community. These questionnaires were aimed at assessing three major issues: 1) frequency of interactions between health staff and caregivers, and avenues for these interactions; 2) content of the discussion between caregivers and health staff, and the time spent on IYCF-related discussions; and 3) knowledge and training received by the health staff on IYCF.
The roles of the supervisors are somewhat different from the other two types of health staff. They do not come in direct contact with caregivers, yet they are mainly responsible for providing training to the HEWs and monitoring and supervising the training of volunteers, conducted by the HEWs. The questionnaire for supervisors, therefore, aims at capturing these interactions. Together, combining information from the HEW/VCHP questionnaires with those administered to the supervisors of individual staff in the survey will generate valuable data on the organization context for the FHWs prior to the introduction of A&T interventions in the health system.
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2020
A&T is a six-year initiative to facilitate change for improved infant and young child feeding (IYCF) practices at scale in Bangladesh, Ethiopia, and Viet Nam. The goal of A&T is to reduce avoidable death and disability due to suboptimal IYCF in the developing world by increasing exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) until 6 months of age and reducing stunting of children 0-24 months of age.
The Ethiopia baseline survey had two broad objectives. The first objective was to gather data on the primary impact indicators of the evaluation, prior to implementation of any A&T interventions, to establish a baseline against which changes would be measured. The second objective was to assess different factors that may influence the outcomes of interest, and thus shape the impact of the primary impact indicators. These factors were determined at five different levels: 1) child, 2) maternal/caregiver, 3) household, 4) community, 5) health care providers, 6) health system. These factors will also provide useful information to interpret the results of the impact evaluation and also signal key issues to pay attention to in the process evaluation.
The Ethiopia baseline survey used five separate questionnaires that aimed to capture elements along the program impact pathways. These tools include 1) a household questionnaire, 2) a staff questionnaire of HEWs, 3) a staff questionnaire of supervisors of HEWs, 4) a VCHP), and 5) a community questionnaire.
Three types of health staff questionnaires (HEW, VCHP, and supervisors) were applied to health staff who are closest to the community or work in the community.
In the Health Extension Program (HEP), the key frontline health workers (FHWs) are the health extension workers (HEWs). In addition to HEWs, HEP has invested in developing community volunteers known as Volunteer Community Health Promoters (VCHP), who are trained by HEWs. This volunteer position, although not directly a part of the health system, is nevertheless integral to providing essential health care at the community level.
The volunteer community health promoters (VCHP) questionnaire, along with the other two health workers questionnaires (HEW and supervisors), aimed at assessing three major issues: 1) frequency of interactions between health staff and caregivers, and avenues for these interactions; 2) content of the discussion between caregivers and health staff, and the time spent on IYCF-related discussions; and 3) knowledge and training received by the health staff on IYCF. In addition, the frontline health worker questionnaires capture the organizational context within which FHWs deliver their interventions. These are captured by inclusion of questions on perceptions related to their workload and their level of satisfaction with their overall job. This is particularly important to capture volunteer workers who receive no salary.
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2020
A&T is a six-year initiative to facilitate change for improved infant and young child feeding (IYCF) practices at scale in Bangladesh, Ethiopia, and Viet Nam. The goal of A&T is to reduce avoidable death and disability due to suboptimal IYCF in the developing world by increasing exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) until 6 months of age and reducing stunting of children 0-24 months of age.
The impact evaluation of A&T’s community-based intervention and mass media activities applied an “adequacy design,” which involves pre- and post-intervention assessments without a non-intervention comparison group. A total of 75 enumeration areas (EAs) were randomly selected from woredas (districts) that were part of the IFHP platform for A&T in Tigray and SNNPR. Repeated cross-sectional surveys were conducted at baseline (2010) and endline (2014) in the 75 EAs.
A short questionnaire was administered to community leaders to gather information on the contextual factors at the community level as well as to understand differences in characteristics across the clusters (EA) over time. One questionnaire was completed for each cluster (EA). This information at the community level is critical to control for externalities that could influence the outcome of the program.
The Ethiopia endline community questionnaire provided information on the following: 1) General characteristics of the EA/kebele (population, livelihood, season of food shortage), 2) Infrastructure (access to main road, electricity, access to clean water, 3) Distance from the nearest major town, type of transportation use to reach the town, 4) Access to the nearest market, 5) Migration patterns, 6) Social and food assistance (productive safety net program, community-based nutrition program), 7) Natural disasters occurred in the area during the last year, 8) Availability and access to health and education facilities (health post, government hospital, private clinic, junior and high school, college).
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2020
A&T is a six-year initiative funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation to facilitate change for improved infant and young child feeding (IYCF) practices at scale in Bangladesh, Ethiopia, and Viet Nam. The goal of A&T is to reduce avoidable death and disability due to suboptimal IYCF in the developing world by increasing exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) until 6 months of age and reducing stunting of children 0-24 months of age.
The impact evaluation of the A&T Ethiopia community-based intervention and mass media activities includes the 2010 baseline and 2014 endline surveys and a smaller-scale 2013 process evaluation survey. Together, these studies generate answers to one of the major learning objectives for the overall initiative: how A&T interventions achieve their impact.
The Ethiopia endline survey applied five separate questionnaires that aimed to capture elements along the program impact pathways. These instruments included a household questionnaire, a community questionnaire and 3 frontline health workers questionnaires, which are:
- health extension workers (HEW) questionnaire
- supervisors of HEWs questionnaire
- volunteer community health promoters questionnaire
The health extension workers (HEW) questionnaire, along with the other two FLW questionnaires, aimed at assessing four major issues: (1) frequency of interactions between FLWs and mothers/caregivers and modes of interactions; (2) content of the interactions between FLWs and mothers/caregivers, especially discussions about IYCF messages and the time spent on IYCF-related discussions; (3) IYCF knowledge and training received by FLWs; and (4) FLWs’ motivation and satisfaction about their jobs. These are captured by questions on perceptions related to workload and level of job satisfaction.
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2020
A&T is a six-year initiative funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation to facilitate change for improved infant and young child feeding (IYCF) practices at scale in Bangladesh, Ethiopia, and Viet Nam. The goal of A&T is to reduce avoidable death and disability due to suboptimal IYCF in the developing world by increasing exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) until 6 months of age and reducing stunting of children 0-24 months of age.
The impact evaluation of the A&T Ethiopia community-based intervention and mass media activities includes the 2010 baseline and 2014 endline surveys and a smaller-scale 2013 process evaluation survey. Together, these studies generate answers to one of the major learning objectives for the overall initiative: how A&T interventions achieve their impact.
The Ethiopia endline survey applied five separate questionnaires that aimed to capture elements along the program impact pathways. These instruments included a household questionnaire, a community questionnaire and 3 frontline health workers questionnaires.
The Ethiopia endline household survey aimed at detecting changes in three age-specific indicators: (1) rates of exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) among infants 0-5.9 months of age; (2) complementary feeding (CF) practices among children 6-23.9 months of age; and (3) stunting prevalence among children 24-59.9 months of age. The same two-stage cluster sampling method for selecting households applied at baseline was used for the endline survey. After random sampling and selection of households across three sampling frames: children aged 0-5.9 months (n=619), 6-23.9 months (n=875), and 24-59.9 months (n=1475) for the three age groups, an oversample of all additional households with children aged 24-35.9 months (n=727) were included in the endline survey to improve the reliability of stunting estimates.
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2020
A&T is a six-year initiative funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation to facilitate change for improved infant and young child feeding (IYCF) practices at scale in Bangladesh, Ethiopia, and Viet Nam. The goal of A&T is to reduce avoidable death and disability due to suboptimal IYCF in the developing world by increasing exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) until 6 months of age and reducing stunting of children 0-24 months of age.
The impact evaluation of the A&T Ethiopia community-based intervention and mass media activities includes the 2010 baseline and 2014 endline surveys and a smaller-scale 2013 process evaluation survey. Together, these studies generate answers to one of the major learning objectives for the overall initiative: how A&T interventions achieve their impact.
The Ethiopia endline survey applied five separate questionnaires that aimed to capture elements along the program impact pathways. These instruments included a household questionnaire, a community questionnaire and 3 frontline health workers questionnaires, which are:
- health extension workers (HEW) questionnaire
- supervisors of HEWs questionnaire
- volunteer community health promoters questionnaire
The supervisors of HEWs questionnaire, along with the other two FLW questionnaires, aimed at assessing four major issues: (1) frequency of interactions between FLWs and mothers/caregivers and modes of interactions; (2) content of the interactions between FLWs and mothers/caregivers, especially discussions about IYCF messages and the time spent on IYCF-related discussions; (3) IYCF knowledge and training received by FLWs; and (4) FLWs’ motivation and satisfaction about their jobs. These are captured by questions on perceptions related to workload and level of job satisfaction.
The roles of supervisors are somewhat different from the other two types of FLWs. They do not come in direct contact with caregivers, yet they are mainly responsible for providing training and supervision to HEWs, and monitoring and supervising the training of volunteers conducted by HEWs. The questionnaires for supervisors, therefore, aim at capturing these interactions. Together, combining information from the HEW and HDA/WDA questionnaires with those administered to supervisors will generate valuable data about the organizational context for FLWs.
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2020
A&T is a six-year initiative funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation to facilitate change for improved infant and young child feeding (IYCF) practices at scale in Bangladesh, Ethiopia, and Viet Nam. The goal of A&T is to reduce avoidable death and disability due to suboptimal IYCF in the developing world by increasing exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) until 6 months of age and reducing stunting of children 0-24 months of age.
The impact evaluation of the A&T Ethiopia community-based intervention and mass media activities includes the 2010 baseline and 2014 endline surveys and a smaller-scale 2013 process evaluation survey. Together, these studies generate answers to one of the major learning objectives for the overall initiative: how A&T interventions achieve their impact.
The Ethiopia endline survey applied five separate questionnaires that aimed to capture elements along the program impact pathways. These instruments included a household questionnaire, a community questionnaire and 3 frontline health workers questionnaires, which are:
- health extension workers (HEW) questionnaire
- supervisors of HEWs questionnaire
- volunteer community health promoters questionnaire.
Volunteers include all kind of volunteers working on promoting health and nutrition such as volunteer community health promoter (VCHP), health development agent (HAD), development agent (DA), health animator etc.
The volunteer community health promoters (VCHP) questionnaire, along with the other two FLW questionnaires, aimed at assessing four major issues: (1) frequency of interactions between FLWs and mothers/caregivers and modes of interactions; (2) content of the interactions between FLWs and mothers/caregivers, especially discussions about IYCF messages and the time spent on IYCF-related discussions; (3) IYCF knowledge and training received by FLWs; and (4) FLWs’ motivation and satisfaction about their jobs. These are captured by questions on perceptions related to workload and level of job satisfaction. This is particularly important to capture among volunteers who receive no salary.
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2020
A&T is a six-year initiative funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation to facilitate change for improved infant and young child feeding (IYCF) practices at scale in Bangladesh, Ethiopia, and Viet Nam. The goal of A&T is to reduce avoidable death and disability due to suboptimal IYCF in the developing world by increasing exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) until 6 months of age and reducing stunting of children 0-24 months of age.
The process evaluation (PE) is intended to answer one of the major learning objectives for the overall initiative, i.e., how A&T interventions achieve their impact. In Ethiopia, the studies that have been conducted as part of the process evaluation include: 1) a case study in 2011 to explore the extent of the training rollout among frontline health workers (FHWs) and to assess FHW and household exposure to interpersonal communication (IPC) tools developed by A&T, 2) a qualitative study in 2012 that included in-depth interviews with health extension workers (HEWs), HEW supervisors, and volunteers and shorter interviews with mothers and fathers to understand modalities of service delivery under IFHP and other A&T platforms, and 3) a quantitative survey in 2013 among FHWs and households to assess different aspects of service delivery and exposure to A&T community based program interventions.
Three types of FHW questionnaires (HEW, VCHP, and supervisors) applied to health staff who are closest to the community or work in the community.
The health extension workers (HEW) questionnaire, along with the other two FHW questionnaires, were aimed at assessing four major issues: 1) FHW’s exposure to training and IPC tools provided by the A&T program, 2) FHW’s exposure to the A&T multi-media components (radio and television messages), 3) FHW’s knowledge and understanding of IYCF and nutrition, 4) the FHW work environment related to IYCF service delivery (motivation, supportive supervision, time commitments to different tasks, and the ability to integrate sustained IYCF counseling into daily routines).
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2020
A&T is a six-year initiative funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation to facilitate change for improved infant and young child feeding (IYCF) practices at scale in Bangladesh, Ethiopia, and Viet Nam. The goal of A&T is to reduce avoidable death and disability due to suboptimal IYCF in the developing world by increasing exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) until 6 months of age and reducing stunting of children 0-24 months of age.
The process evaluation (PE) is intended to answer one of the major learning objectives for the overall initiative, i.e., how A&T interventions achieve their impact. In Ethiopia, the studies that have been conducted as part of the process evaluation include: 1) a case study in 2011 to explore the extent of the training rollout among frontline health workers (FHWs) and to assess FHW and household exposure to interpersonal communication (IPC) tools developed by A&T, 2) a qualitative study in 2012 that included in-depth interviews with health extension workers (HEWs), HEW supervisors, and volunteers and shorter interviews with mothers and fathers to understand modalities of service delivery under IFHP and other A&T platforms, and 3) a quantitative survey in 2013 among FHWs and households to assess different aspects of service delivery and exposure to A&T community based program interventions.
The Ethiopia process evaluation surveys of frontline health workers and households had two broad objectives. The first objective was to assess and understand the FHW work environment related to IYCF service delivery, in order to better answer how A&T interventions achieve impact. The second objective was to assess households’ exposure to the A&T program components/activities, as well as to compare IYCF knowledge and practices to the baseline survey in 2010 in order to get an idea of progress toward impact.
The Ethiopia process evaluation survey used four separate questionnaires that aimed to capture elements along the program impact pathways. These tools include 1) a household questionnaire, 2) a staff questionnaire of HEWs, 3) a staff questionnaire of supervisors of HEWs, and 4) a volunteer community health promoters (VCHP) questionnaire.
The main objectives of the Ethiopia household survey are to assess: 1) Exposure of the mothers/caregivers of children less than two years of age to key IYCF messages promoted by A&T, 2) Source of messages (FHW, mass media, community), 3) Sources of support for IYCF related issues, 4) Frequency of contacts with FHWs, 5) Knowledge and understanding of key IYCF messages promoted by A&T, and 6) Adoption of selected IYCF practices promoted by A&T and factors that facilitate the message.
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2020
A&T is a six-year initiative funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation to facilitate change for improved infant and young child feeding (IYCF) practices at scale in Bangladesh, Ethiopia, and Viet Nam. The goal of A&T is to reduce avoidable death and disability due to suboptimal IYCF in the developing world by increasing exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) until 6 months of age and reducing stunting of children 0-24 months of age.
The process evaluation (PE) is intended to answer one of the major learning objectives for the overall initiative, i.e., how A&T interventions achieve their impact. In Ethiopia, the studies that have been conducted as part of the process evaluation include: 1) a case study in 2011 to explore the extent of the training rollout among frontline health workers (FHWs) and to assess FHW and household exposure to interpersonal communication (IPC) tools developed by A&T, 2) a qualitative study in 2012 that included in-depth interviews with health extension workers (HEWs), HEW supervisors, and volunteers and shorter interviews with mothers and fathers to understand modalities of service delivery under IFHP and other A&T platforms, and 3) a quantitative survey in 2013 among FHWs and households to assess different aspects of service delivery and exposure to A&T community based program interventions.
The Ethiopia process evaluation surveys of frontline health workers and households had two broad objectives. The first objective was to assess and understand the FHW work environment related to IYCF service delivery, in order to better answer how A&T interventions achieve impact. The second objective was to assess households’ exposure to the A&T program components/activities, as well as to compare IYCF knowledge and practices to the baseline survey in 2010 in order to get an idea of progress toward impact.
Three types of FHW questionnaires (HEW, VCHP, and supervisors) applied to health staff who are closest to the community or work in the community. These questionnaires were aimed at assessing four major issues: 1) FHW’s exposure to training and IPC tools provided by the A&T program, 2) FHW’s exposure to the A&T multi-media components (radio and television messages), 3) FHW’s knowledge and understanding of IYCF and nutrition, 4) the FHW work environment related to IYCF service delivery (motivation, supportive supervision, time commitments to different tasks, and the ability to integrate sustained IYCF counseling into daily routines).
The roles of the supervisors are somewhat different from the other two types of health staff. They do not come in direct contact with caregivers, yet they are mainly responsible for providing training to the HEWs and monitoring and supervising the training of volunteers, conducted by the HEWs. The questionnaire for supervisors, therefore, aims at capturing these interactions.
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2020
A&T is a six-year initiative funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation to facilitate change for improved infant and young child feeding (IYCF) practices at scale in Bangladesh, Ethiopia, and Viet Nam. The goal of A&T is to reduce avoidable death and disability due to suboptimal IYCF in the developing world by increasing exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) until 6 months of age and reducing stunting of children 0-24 months of age.
The process evaluation (PE) is intended to answer one of the major learning objectives for the overall initiative, i.e., how A&T interventions achieve their impact. In Ethiopia, the studies that have been conducted as part of the process evaluation include: 1) a case study in 2011 to explore the extent of the training rollout among frontline health workers (FHWs) and to assess FHW and household exposure to interpersonal communication (IPC) tools developed by A&T, 2) a qualitative study in 2012 that included in-depth interviews with health extension workers (HEWs), HEW supervisors, and volunteers and shorter interviews with mothers and fathers to understand modalities of service delivery under IFHP and other A&T platforms, and 3) a quantitative survey in 2013 among FHWs and households to assess different aspects of service delivery and exposure to A&T community based program interventions.
The Ethiopia process evaluation surveys of frontline health workers and households had two broad objectives. The first objective was to assess and understand the FHW work environment related to IYCF service delivery, in order to better answer how A&T interventions achieve impact. The second objective was to assess households’ exposure to the A&T program components/activities, as well as to compare IYCF knowledge and practices to the baseline survey in 2010 in order to get an idea of progress toward impact.
Three types of FHW questionnaires (HEW, VCHP, and supervisors) applied to health staff who are closest to the community or work in the community.
Volunteers include all kind of volunteers working on promoting health and nutrition such as volunteer community health promoter (VCHP), health development agent (HAD), development agent (DA), health animator etc.
The volunteer community health promoters (VCHP) questionnaire, along with the other two FHW questionnaires, were aimed at assessing four major issues: 1) FHW’s exposure to training and IPC tools provided by the A&T program, 2) FHW’s exposure to the A&T multi-media components (radio and television messages), 3) FHW’s knowledge and understanding of IYCF and nutrition, 4) the FHW work environment related to IYCF service delivery (motivation, supportive supervision, time commitments to different tasks, and the ability to integrate sustained IYCF counseling into daily routines).
Washington, D.C. 2010
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2019
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2016
In particular, the survey inquired about PSNP interventions in the surveyed locations, including the type of work conducted (road building, school building, tree planting, etc.), how it affected the communities access to amenities and services (schools, markets, clinics) or agricultural productivity. In addition, the community survey will be used to determine the structure of business activity in the community, as well as the dynamics of local markets and physical connections to regional and national markets.
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2017
In particular, the survey inquired about PSNP interventions in the surveyed locations, including the type of work conducted (road building, school building, tree planting, etc.), how it affected the communities access to amenities and services (schools, markets, clinics) or agricultural productivity. In addition, the community survey will be used to determine the structure of business activity in the community, as well as the dynamics of local markets and physical connections to regional and national markets.
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2016
In particular, the survey collected data about hired labor necessary to accurately model production functions in LEWIE, as well as input and output markets.
Ethiopian Development Research Institute (EDRI); Institute of Development Studies (IDS) (University of Sussex); International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Addis Ababa, Ethiopia; Washington, DC 2014
Washington, D.C. 2005
Hoddinott, John; Yohannes, Yisehac. Washington, D.C. 2011
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2022
A structured household questionnaire was used to collect household, plot, and individual level data. Questionnaire modules related with land related legal knowledge and advice, and land rental market participation were administered separately for the head and spouse. Hence, a detail gender dis-aggregated data enables a closer analysis of gendered aspects of the impact of the second-level land certification program not only at household level (inter-household dimensions), but also within a household (intra-household aspects).
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2022
A structured household questionnaire was used to collect household, plot, and individual level data. The questionnaire modules cover household characteristics, land use (crop production), input use, labor, livestock ownership, shocks, off-fam employment, access to credit, ownership of productive equipment’s and remittances. This dataset, combined with the main FtF end-line 2018 data, enables to assess land rental market interactions between landlords and tenants.
International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT). Washington, DC 2020
World Agroforestry Center (ICRAF); Sokoine University of Agriculture (SUA). Washington, DC 2017
International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT). Washington, DC 2017
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI); State University of Campinas (UNICAMP); Federal University of São Carlos;Global Forum for Rural Advisory Services (GFRAS); Latin American Network for Rural Extension Services (RELASER). Washington, DC; 2018
Data collection instruments were composed of questionnaires focusing on objective questions, allowing only closed answers to identify the interviewee’s perception of his or her reality. The possibilities for responses were elaborated on a five-point Likert scale—from the least to the greatest—asking respondents to indicate how much they agree or disagree, approve or disapprove, or believe to be true or false. The questionnaire for family farmers was composed of 56 questions, encompassing different indicators, among which three were specific for black rural and indigenous communities. The researchers also added questions from the Brazilian Food Insecurity Scale.
In total researchers conducted 1,000 interviews with farmers and 87 interviews with extensionists (in some territories the goal of 20 interviews with the extensionists in each territory was not achieved due to the difficulty in contacting them or their unavailability in the study period) in the five territories between August 2014 to January 2015.
International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI). Washington, DC 2014
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, D.C. 2013
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI); Master of Environmental Policy Program (iMEP), Duke Kunshan University; Department of Environmental Studies, New York University; University of Agriculture-Faisalabad, Pakistan. Washington, DC; 2018
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI); Arizona State University (ASU); Foundation for Ecological Security (FES); Jana Jagrithi. Washington, DC; 2018
Behavioral and attitudinal variables regarding water use and mechanisms for regulating and responding to changes and uncertainty in social and ecological conditions were also monitored at the household and community levels. Treatment groups were villages in which field experiments with collective action games were implemented. Control cases were comparable communities where no such experiments were conducted but the same NGOs are working to strengthen collective groundwater management.
Follow up game sessions and surveys were conducted two years after the initial sessions to explore any lasting effect, if any, of such intervention. The game protocol was slightly modified in the second wave to incorporate domestic water consumption in the game scenario. Overall, this project analyses whether the experimental exercise changes participants’ mental models about the interactions between resource dynamics, group goals, and private interests.
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2017
At IMPACT's core is a partial equilibrium, multimarket economic model that simulates national and international agricultural markets. Links to climate, water, and crop models support the integrated study of changing environmental, biophysical, and socioeconomic trends, allowing for in-depth analysis of a variety of critical issues of interest to policy makers at national, regional, and global levels. IMPACT benefits from close interactions with scientists at all 15 CGIAR research centers through the Global Futures and Strategic Foresight (GFSF) program, and with other leading global economic modeling efforts around the world through Agricultural Model Intercomparison and Improvement Project (AgMIP).
This dataset is an extended set of results from IMPACT version 3.2.1 generated for the analysis originally presented in Sulser et al (2015) and covers “baseline scenarios” of different socioeconomic assumptions, climate change, and no climate change from 2010 to 2050.
International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI). Washington, DC 2019
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2022
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2014
2005
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2020
World Agroforestry Center (ICRAF); Sokoine University of Agriculture (SUA). Washington, DC 2017
Janssens, Wendy; Kramer, Berber; van der List, Marijn; Paper, David. Netherlands 2019
HarvestChoice, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2016
International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA); International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2017
International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA). Washington, DC 2016
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2013
The second indicator is the number of food policy relevant journal articles published internationally within the last five years per full-time PhD-equivalent researcher. This input-output ratio measure is indicative of the efficiency of the policy research environment. The number of publications was determined from searches in the EconLit and Web of Science databases for journal articles related to food policy and authored by experts who were counted in the assessment of the first indicator. Earlier attempts to quantify and collect comparable data on other policy research outputs, such as policy briefs, interactions with government ministries, or conference contributions presented numerous challenges. For this reason, and because international publications guarantee a minimum and comparable level of quality, this indicator was chosen.
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2020
IFPRI created the Food Policy Research Capacity Indicators (FPRCI) database in 2010 and has since continued to expand and refine it. Data are currently collected for 33 countries; data for Myanmar was added in 2017. A consistent methodology is followed to enable a comparison of values across time and countries. The database was most recently updated with numbers for 2019.
Analysts/researchers counts the professionals employed at local organizations whose work involves food policy research or analysis. To introduce some uniformity, IFPRI also presents a modified quantification of this headcount: full-time equivalent analysts/researchers with PhD. To obtain an indicator of per capita food policy research capacity, this research capacity is then divided by the country’s rural population (full-time equivalent researchers per million rural residents). This helps to illustrate the impact of local food policy research in a country. This indicator was last updated in 2015.
The quality of a country’s food policy research capacity is estimated by tallying the number of relevant international publications in peer-reviewed journals over a five-year period. IFPRI views this as a reflection of the local enabling intellectual environment for food policy research. This indicator allows for comparison across countries, as it ensures an internationally accepted standard of quality for publications. The final indicator is derived by dividing the number of international publications by the number of full-time equivalent researchers with a PhD, providing a measure of productivity.
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC; 2018
IFPRI created a database for food policy research capacity in 2010, and has continued to expand and refine it. The data presented are currently collected for 33 countries; data for Myanmar were added in 2017. A consistent methodology is followed to enable comparison of values across time and countries. The database was most recently updated with numbers for 2017.
“Analysts/researchers” is a head count of professionals employed at local organizations whose work involves food policy research or analysis. To introduce some uniformity, IFPRI also presents a modified quantification of the head count: "full-time equivalent analysts/researchers with PhD equivalent." To obtain an indicator of per capita food policy research capacity, this research capacity is then divided by the country’s rural population ("full-time equivalent researchers per million rural residents"). This helps to illustrate the impact of local food policy research in a country. This indicator was last updated in 2015.
The quality of a country’s food policy research capacity is estimated by tallying the number of relevant international publications in peer-reviewed journals over a five-year period. IFPRI views this as a reflection of the local enabling environment for food policy research. This indicator allows for comparison across countries, as it ensures an internationally accepted standard of quality for publications. The final indicator ("publications per full-time equivalent researcher") is derived by dividing the number of international publications by the number of full-time equivalent researchers with a PhD, providing a measure of productivity.
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2019
IFPRI created a database for food policy research capacity in 2010 and has continued to expand and refine it. The data presented are currently collected for 33 countries; data for Myanmar were added in 2017. A consistent methodology is followed to enable comparison of values across time and countries. The database was most recently updated with numbers for 2018.
“Analysts/researchers” is a head count of professionals employed at local organizations whose work involves food policy research or analysis. To introduce some uniformity, IFPRI also presents a modified quantification of the headcount: "full-time equivalent analysts/researchers with the Ph.D. equivalent." To obtain an indicator of per capita food policy research capacity, this research capacity is then divided by the country’s rural population ("full-time equivalent researchers per million rural residents"). This helps to illustrate the impact of local food policy research in a country. This indicator was last updated in 2015.
The quality of a country’s food policy research capacity is estimated by tallying the number of relevant international publications in peer-reviewed journals over a five-year period. IFPRI views this as a reflection of the local enabling environment for food policy research. This indicator allows for comparison across countries, as it ensures an internationally accepted standard of quality for publications. The final indicator ("publications per full-time equivalent researcher") is derived by dividing the number of international publications by the number of full-time equivalent researchers with a Ph.D., providing a measure of productivity.
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2023
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2023
Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD); Institut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé (IRSS); HarvestPlus, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2016
Its objectives were: (i) to provide reliable information on sorghum consumption, micronutrient intakes and micronutrient deficiencies among women of reproductive age and their preschool children, in order to better inform sorghum micronutrient content breeding targets and future interventions; and (ii) to investigate the relationship between biomarkers of status and dietary intakes of iron, zinc and vitamin A among the study subjects in order to better inform the evaluation design of future biofortification interventions.
This work is part of the Grand Challenges in Global Health (#9), an initiative of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation through a grant to the International Food Policy Research Institute; with additional funds from the Institut de Recherche pour le Développement.
International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA). Washington, DC 2021
International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA). Washington, DC 2021
International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA). Washington, DC 2021
International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA); International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI). Washington, DC 2018
Ministry of Agriculture, Irrigation and Water Development; Lilongwe University of Agriculture & Natural Resources (LUANAR); Michigan State University (MSU). Washington, DC 2017
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) . Washington, DC 2015
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2021
The survey is split into 9 survey modules:
1. Sampling (SA) – location information about the region, district, and community where the respondent is based
2. General Information (ID) – basic demographic, educational, household background, and occupational information of respondent
3. Farming & Livestock (FL) – details about household’s farming and livestock activities
4. Agricultural Extension Services (EX) – details about access to, and use of, agriculture or livestock advisory services for the subset of the sample that has agricultural land or has their primary or secondary occupation in agriculture
5. Political and Community Participation (PP) – information about respondent’s degree of participation in collective action and voting, engagement with elected officials, and frequency of access to the news
6. Perspectives on Local Government and Decentralization (LG) - subjective views about how well local government is functioning and preferences for investment in respondent’s community
7. Household Welfare (HW) – questions about the range of assets owned by the respondent’s household, as well as access to major services (e.g. water, electricity, etc.)
8. Access to facilities (AF) – degree of household’s access to public services and facilities, such as health post, market, etc.
9. Final (FI) – enumerator observations
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC; 2018
Washington, D.C 2000
Washington, D.C. 2005
Washington, D.C. 2008
Washington, D.C. 2007
Mogues, Tewodaj. Washington, D.C. 2012
The values in the dataset were denoted in ‘old’ cedi, not the new Ghana cedi (GHC), which was introduced in July 2007. One new GHC is equivalent to 10,000 ‘old’ cedi. The dataset retains the denomination used in the original dataset (which pertains to the years 1994-2004, before the introduction of the GHC). The values are nominal (not adjusted for inflation). No questionnaires or other survey instruments have been used, since this was a collection of secondary administrative data. (2012-03-13)
International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT); Zambian Agriculture Research Institute (ZARI). Washington, DC 2019
International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT); Zambian Agriculture Research Institute (ZARI). Washington, DC 2021
Washington, D.C. 2000
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2019
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI); International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA). Washington, DC 2016
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2019
International Research Institute for Climate and Society (IRI); Michigan State University (MSU); HarvestChoice, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2015
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2016
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2019
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2019
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2019
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2019
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2019
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2019
Washington, D.C. 1999
Koo, Jawoo; Dimes, John. Washington, DC 2013
There are multiple ways to utilize these generic soil profiles in crop modeling applications, especially when soil measurement data is not available for the study site. For example, (1) users can choose the one that best matches the soil typically found in the study area by following the decision tree of three multiple-choice questions and use it as a starting point, or (2) users can run models with all 27 soil profiles for a given study site to create a possible range of simulation results, which can be narrowed down later as more site-specific information becomes available.
These generic soil profiles does not replace existing soil mapping efforts nor site-specific soil measurements. Instead this approach addresses the need for a set of reasonably representative and prototypical soil profiles in certain types of crop modeling applications (e.g., global-scale modeling studies). Due to the nature of being "generic," there will be applications for which the use of HC27 is not desirable, especially where detailed soil property dynamics beyond the three criteria are emphasized.
HarvestChoice, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI); University of California (UC), Davis. Washington, DC 2016
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC; 2018
The sources of household survey data are the following: National Household Budget Surveys and National Panel Surveys (for Tanzania); National Household Surveys and National Panel Surveys (for Uganda); and Ghana Living Standards Surveys (for Ghana). Precipitation data are obtained from the Climate Hazards Group InfraRed Precipitation with Station data (CHIRPS). Temperature data are obtained from the Center for Climatic Research at the University of Delaware. Other landscape-level biophysical data analyzed include night lights, population density, and agroecological zones (AEZ).
HarvestChoice, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2017
HarvestPlus, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI); Program in International and Community Nutrition, University of California, Davis (PICN, UCDavis); International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh (ICDDR, B). Washington, DC 2019
In each region, 240 children ages 24-48 months were enrolled. Dietary information was collected primarily by direct observation and weighing of food preparation and consumption, including test weighing of milk intakes by breast-fed children. Height and weight were measured in all children, and in a subset of children, blood samples were collected and analyzed for concentrations of serum zinc and indicators of infection.
Olney, Deanna K.; Dillon, Andrew. 2010
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2019
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2019
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2019
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2019
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2019
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2019
Washington, D.C. 2000
World Agroforestry Center (ICRAF); Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF). Washington, DC 2021
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2021
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2018
Data were collected on the three previous agricultural seasons, that is, from August 2011 to August 2012. The survey covered the same households that were sampled for the IMPACT Lite surveys, designed by researchers at the International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI) in order to supplement the detailed productivity-related information collected through that survey.
Gender-disaggregated data were gathered on climate change perceptions, agricultural activities, decision-making, weather information, risk perceptions, and adaptation. Information was also collected on assets, farming decisions, agricultural practices, respondents’ access to information, extension services, and credit; and their participation in community groups. Data were gathered through the use of questionnaires administered through face-to-face interviews. Two adult decision makers (one male and one female) were interviewed separately per household in order to capture independent perceptions.
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2018
• How do men and women perceive climate change and, particularly, the livelihood risks associated with climate change?
• What are the gender disparities in access to and control over assets and how and to what degree does the disparity in assets affect how men and women experience climate shocks and change?
• How and to what degree does asset disparity determine how men and women respond to climate shocks and change?
• Which coping strategies and adaptation options are favored by women and men, respectively, and why?
The survey collected detailed gender-disaggregated data on these issues to inform strategies to increase climate change resilience among both women and men.The gender survey contained 13 modules, posing questions at the household and individual levels. These modules are: 1) a household roster; 2) sketch of the farm (pre-populated from a previous survey—IMPACT Lite); 3) land ownership, management, and decision making; 4) decision-making authority on agricultural, livestock, and household decisions; 5) adoption and knowledge of climate-smart agriculture practices; 6) access to and use of climate and agricultural information services; 7) access to and use of credit; 8) membership in groups; 9) fuel and water use; 10) experience with climate shocks and coping strategies; 11) perception of climate change and its potential impacts; 12) identification of adaptation strategies; and 13) cognitive decision-making and personal values questions.
Four sets of data are generated from the survey conducted in four sites-Nyando and Wote in Kenya, Rakai in Uganda, and Kaffrine in Senegal. This study contains data from Kaffrine.
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2018
• How do men and women perceive climate change and, particularly, the livelihood risks associated with climate change?
• What are the gender disparities in access to and control over assets and how and to what degree does the disparity in assets affect how men and women experience climate shocks and change?
• How and to what degree does asset disparity determine how men and women respond to climate shocks and change?
• Which coping strategies and adaptation options are favored by women and men, respectively, and why?
The survey collected detailed gender-disaggregated data on these issues to inform strategies to increase climate change resilience among both women and men. The gender survey contained 13 modules, posing questions at the household and individual levels. These modules are: 1) a household roster; 2) sketch of the farm (pre-populated from a previous survey—IMPACT Lite); 3) land ownership, management, and decision making; 4) decision-making authority on agricultural, livestock, and household decisions; 5) adoption and knowledge of climate-smart agriculture practices; 6) access to and use of climate and agricultural information services; 7) access to and use of credit; 8) membership in groups; 9) fuel and water use; 10) experience with climate shocks and coping strategies; 11) perception of climate change and its potential impacts; 12) identification of adaptation strategies; and 13) cognitive decision-making and personal values questions.
Four sets of data are generated from the survey conducted in four sites-Nyando and Wote in Kenya, Rakai in Uganda, and Kaffrine in Senegal. This study contains data from Nyando.
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2018
• How do men and women perceive climate change and, particularly, the livelihood risks associated with climate change?
• What are the gender disparities in access to and control over assets and how and to what degree does the disparity in assets affect how men and women experience climate shocks and change?
• How and to what degree does asset disparity determine how men and women respond to climate shocks and change?
• Which coping strategies and adaptation options are favored by women and men, respectively, and why?
The survey collected detailed gender-disaggregated data on these issues to inform strategies to increase climate change resilience among both women and men. The gender survey contained 13 modules, posing questions at the household and individual levels. These modules are: 1) a household roster; 2) sketch of the farm (pre-populated from a previous survey—IMPACT Lite); 3) land ownership, management, and decision making; 4) decision-making authority on agricultural, livestock, and household decisions; 5) adoption and knowledge of climate-smart agriculture practices; 6) access to and use of climate and agricultural information services; 7) access to and use of credit; 8) membership in groups; 9) fuel and water use; 10) experience with climate shocks and coping strategies; 11) perception of climate change and its potential impacts; 12) identification of adaptation strategies; and 13) cognitive decision-making and personal values questions.
Four sets of data are generated from the survey conducted in four sites-Nyando and Wote in Kenya, Rakai in Uganda, and Kaffrine in Senegal. This study contains data from Rakai.
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2018
• How do men and women perceive climate change and, particularly, the livelihood risks associated with climate change?
• What are the gender disparities in access to and control over assets and how and to what degree does the disparity in assets affect how men and women experience climate shocks and change?
• How and to what degree does asset disparity determine how men and women respond to climate shocks and change?
• Which coping strategies and adaptation options are favored by women and men, respectively, and why?
The survey collected detailed gender-disaggregated data on these issues to inform strategies to increase climate change resilience among both women and men. The gender survey contained 13 modules, posing questions at the household and individual levels. These modules are: 1) a household roster; 2) sketch of the farm (pre-populated from a previous survey—IMPACT Lite); 3) land ownership, management, and decision making; 4) decision-making authority on agricultural, livestock, and household decisions; 5) adoption and knowledge of climate-smart agriculture practices; 6) access to and use of climate and agricultural information services; 7) access to and use of credit; 8) membership in groups; 9) fuel and water use; 10) experience with climate shocks and coping strategies; 11) perception of climate change and its potential impacts; 12) identification of adaptation strategies; and 13) cognitive decision-making and personal values questions.
Four sets of data are generated from the survey conducted in four sites-Nyando and Wote in Kenya, Rakai in Uganda, and Kaffrine in Senegal. This study contains data from Wote.
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2022
The IMPACT model was used to evaluate impacts of climate change on aggregate food production, food consumption (kcal per person per day), net trade of major food commodity groups, and the population at risk of hunger. At IMPACT’s core is a partial equilibrium, multimarket economic model that simulates national and international agricultural markets. Links to climate, water, and crop models support the integrated study of changing environmental, biophysical, and socioeconomic trends, allowing for in-depth analysis of a variety of critical issues of interest to policymakers at national, regional, and global levels. IMPACT benefits from close interactions with scientists across CGIAR and other leading global economic modeling efforts around the world through the Agricultural Model Intercomparison and Improvement Project (AgMIP).
This dataset summarizes results from the latest IMPACT projections to 2030 and 2050, for a scenario that includes the impacts of climate change and a “baseline” scenario that assumes no climate change (for comparison). These results update previous projections by showing aggregations to six regions: Central and West Asia and North Africa; Eastern and Southern Africa; Latin America and the Caribbean; South Asia; Southeast Asia; West and Central Africa; and the rest of the world.
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2017
At IMPACT's core is a partial equilibrium, multimarket economic model that simulates national and international agricultural markets. Links to climate, water, and crop models support the integrated study of changing environmental, biophysical, and socioeconomic trends, allowing for in-depth analysis of a variety of critical issues of interest to policy makers at national, regional, and global levels. IMPACT benefits from close interactions with scientists at all 15 CGIAR research centers through the Global Futures and Strategic Foresight (GFSF) program, and with other leading global economic modeling efforts around the world through Agricultural Model Intercomparison and Improvement Project (AgMIP).
This dataset summarizes results from the latest IMPACT projections to 2030 and 2050. Results are included for production, consumption, and trade of major food commodity groups, by regions and country. The projections are for two "baseline scenarios"-one considers the impacts of climate change, while the assumes no climate change (for comparison).
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2017
At IMPACT's core is a partial equilibrium, multimarket economic model that simulates national and international agricultural markets. Links to climate, water, and crop models support the integrated study of changing environmental, biophysical, and socioeconomic trends, allowing for in-depth analysis of a variety of critical issues of interest to policy makers at national, regional, and global levels. IMPACT benefits from close interactions with scientists at all 15 CGIAR research centers through the Global Futures and Strategic Foresight (GFSF) program, and with other leading global economic modeling efforts around the world through Agricultural Model Intercomparison and Improvement Project (AgMIP).
This dataset summarizes results from the latest IMPACT projections to 2030 and 2050. Results are included for total demand and demand index of various agricultural commodities, by region and for selected countries. The projections are for two "baseline scenarios"-one considers the impacts of climate change, while the assumes no climate change (for comparison).
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI);. Washington, DC 2017
At IMPACT's core is a partial equilibrium, multimarket economic model that simulates national and international agricultural markets. Links to climate, water, and crop models support the integrated study of changing environmental, biophysical, and socioeconomic trends, allowing for in-depth analysis of a variety of critical issues of interest to policy makers at national, regional, and global levels. IMPACT benefits from close interactions with scientists at all 15 CGIAR research centers through the Global Futures and Strategic Foresight (GFSF) program, and with other leading global economic modeling efforts around the world through Agricultural Model Intercomparison and Improvement Project (AgMIP).
This dataset summarizes results from the latest IMPACT projections to 2030 and 2050. Results are included for production, consumption, and for the population at risk of hunger, by region and for selected countries. The projections are for two "baseline scenarios"-one considers the impacts of climate change, while the assumes no climate change (for comparison).
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2019
At IMPACT's core is a partial equilibrium, the multimarket economic model that simulates national and international agricultural markets. Links to climate, water, and crop models support the integrated study of changing environmental, biophysical, and socioeconomic trends, allowing for in-depth analysis of a variety of critical issues of interest to policy makers at national, regional, and global levels. IMPACT benefits from close interactions with scientists at all 15 CGIAR research center through the Global Futures and Strategic Foresight (GFSF) program, and with other leading global economic modeling efforts around the world through Agricultural Model Intercomparison and Improvement Project (AgMIP).
This dataset summarizes results from the latest IMPACT projections to 2030 and 2050. Results are included for production, consumption, and for the population at risk of hunger, by region and for selected countries. The projections are for two "baseline scenarios"-one considers the impacts of climate change, while the assumes no climate change (for comparison).
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2017
At IMPACT's core is a partial equilibrium, multimarket economic model that simulates national and international agricultural markets. Links to climate, water, and crop models support the integrated study of changing environmental, biophysical, and socioeconomic trends, allowing for in-depth analysis of a variety of critical issues of interest to policy makers at national, regional, and global levels. IMPACT benefits from close interactions with scientists at all 15 CGIAR research centers through the Global Futures and Strategic Foresight (GFSF) program, and with other l
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2019
At IMPACT's core is a partial equilibrium, the multimarket economic model that simulates national and international agricultural markets. Links to climate, water, and crop models support the integrated study of changing environmental, biophysical, and socioeconomic trends, allowing for in-depth analysis of a variety of critical issues of interest to policy makers at national, regional, and global levels. IMPACT benefits from close interactions with scientists at all 15 CGIAR research center through the Global Futures and Strategic Foresight (GFSF) program, and with other leading global economic modeling efforts around the world through Agricultural Model Intercomparison and Improvement Project (AgMIP).
This dataset summarizes results from the latest IMPACT projections to 2030 and 2050. Results are included for production, consumption, and trade of major food commodity groups, by regions and country. The projections are for two "baseline scenarios"-one considers the impacts of climate change, while the assumes no climate change (for comparison).
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2022
Policy makers, analysts, and civil society face increasing challenges to reducing hunger and sustainably improving food security. Modeling alternative future scenarios and assessing their outcomes can help inform policy choices. The International Food Policy Research Institute’s IMPACT model is an integrated system of linked economic, climate, water, and crop models that allows for the exploration of such scenarios.
The IMPACT model was used to evaluate impacts of climate change on aggregate food production, food consumption (kcal per person per day), net trade of major food commodity groups, and the population at risk of hunger. At IMPACT’s core is a partial equilibrium, multimarket economic model that simulates national and international agricultural markets. Links to climate, water, and crop models support the integrated study of changing environmental, biophysical, and socioeconomic trends, allowing for in-depth analysis of a variety of critical issues of interest to policymakers at national, regional, and global levels. IMPACT benefits from close interactions with scientists across CGIAR and other leading global economic modeling efforts around the world through the Agricultural Model Intercomparison and Improvement Project (AgMIP).
This dataset summarizes results from the latest IMPACT projections to 2030 and 2050, for a scenario that includes the impacts of climate change and a “baseline” scenario that assumes no climate change (for comparison). These results update previous projections by showing aggregations to six regions: Central and West Asia and North Africa; Eastern and Southern Africa; Latin America and the Caribbean; South Asia; Southeast Asia; West and Central Africa; and the rest of the world.
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2022
The IMPACT model was used to evaluate impacts of climate change on aggregate food production, food consumption (kcal per person per day), net trade of major food commodity groups, and the population at risk of hunger. At IMPACT’s core is a partial equilibrium, multimarket economic model that simulates national and international agricultural markets. Links to climate, water, and crop models support the integrated study of changing environmental, biophysical, and socioeconomic trends, allowing for in-depth analysis of a variety of critical issues of interest to policymakers at national, regional, and global levels. IMPACT benefits from close interactions with scientists across CGIAR and other leading global economic modeling efforts around the world through the Agricultural Model Intercomparison and Improvement Project (AgMIP).
This dataset summarizes results from the latest IMPACT projections to 2030 and 2050, for a scenario that includes the impacts of climate change and a “baseline” scenario that assumes no climate change (for comparison). These results update previous projections by showing aggregations to six regions: Central and West Asia and North Africa; Eastern and Southern Africa; Latin America and the Caribbean; South Asia; Southeast Asia; West and Central Africa; and the rest of the world.
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2017
At IMPACT's core is a partial equilibrium, multimarket economic model that simulates national and international agricultural markets. Links to climate, water, and crop models support the integrated study of changing environmental, biophysical, and socioeconomic trends, allowing for in-depth analysis of a variety of critical issues of interest to policy makers at national, regional, and global levels. IMPACT benefits from close interactions with scientists at all 15 CGIAR research centers through the Global Futures and Strategic Foresight (GFSF) program, and with other leading global economic modeling efforts around the world through Agricultural Model Intercomparison and Improvement Project (AgMIP).
This dataset summarizes results from the latest IMPACT projections to 2030 and 2050. Results are included for production, consumption, and trade of major food commodity groups, by regions and country. The projections are for two "baseline scenarios"-one considers the impacts of climate change, while the assumes no climate change (for comparison).
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2022
The IMPACT model was used to evaluate impacts of climate change on aggregate food production, food consumption (kcal per person per day), net trade of major food commodity groups, and the population at risk of hunger. At IMPACT’s core is a partial equilibrium, multimarket economic model that simulates national and international agricultural markets. Links to climate, water, and crop models support the integrated study of changing environmental, biophysical, and socioeconomic trends, allowing for in-depth analysis of a variety of critical issues of interest to policymakers at national, regional, and global levels. IMPACT benefits from close interactions with scientists across CGIAR and other leading global economic modeling efforts around the world through the Agricultural Model Intercomparison and Improvement Project (AgMIP).
This dataset summarizes results from the latest IMPACT projections to 2030 and 2050, for a scenario that includes the impacts of climate change and a “baseline” scenario that assumes no climate change (for comparison). These results update previous projections by showing aggregations to six regions: Central and West Asia and North Africa; Eastern and Southern Africa; Latin America and the Caribbean; South Asia; Southeast Asia; West and Central Africa; and the rest of the world.
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2022
The IMPACT model was used to evaluate impacts of climate change on aggregate food production, food consumption (kcal per person per day), net trade of major food commodity groups, and the population at risk of hunger. At IMPACT’s core is a partial equilibrium, multimarket economic model that simulates national and international agricultural markets. Links to climate, water, and crop models support the integrated study of changing environmental, biophysical, and socioeconomic trends, allowing for in-depth analysis of a variety of critical issues of interest to policymakers at national, regional, and global levels. IMPACT benefits from close interactions with scientists across CGIAR and other leading global economic modeling efforts around the world through the Agricultural Model Intercomparison and Improvement Project (AgMIP).
This dataset summarizes results from the latest IMPACT projections to 2030 and 2050, for a scenario that includes the impacts of climate change and a “baseline” scenario that assumes no climate change (for comparison). These results update previous projections by showing aggregations to six regions: Central and West Asia and North Africa; Eastern and Southern Africa; Latin America and the Caribbean; South Asia; Southeast Asia; West and Central Africa; and the rest of the world.
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC; 2022
The IMPACT model was used to evaluate impacts of climate change on aggregate food production, food consumption (kcal per person per day), net trade of major food commodity groups, and the population at risk of hunger. At IMPACT’s core is a partial equilibrium, multimarket economic model that simulates national and international agricultural markets. Links to climate, water, and crop models support the integrated study of changing environmental, biophysical, and socioeconomic trends, allowing for in-depth analysis of a variety of critical issues of interest to policymakers at national, regional, and global levels. IMPACT benefits from close interactions with scientists across CGIAR and other leading global economic modeling efforts around the world through the Agricultural Model Intercomparison and Improvement Project (AgMIP).
This dataset summarizes results from the latest IMPACT projections to 2030 and 2050, for a scenario that includes the impacts of climate change and a “baseline” scenario that assumes no climate change (for comparison). These results update previous projections by showing aggregations to six regions: Central and West Asia and North Africa; Eastern and Southern Africa; Latin America and the Caribbean; South Asia; Southeast Asia; West and Central Africa; and the rest of the world.
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI); UNICEF; World Food Programme (WFP). Washington, DC 2016
The Uganda ECD study was designed as a prospective, cluster-randomized control trial, in which treatment households would receive seven transfers of food or cash on approximately 6-week distribution cycles, conditional on having a child aged 3-5 years participating in an ECD center. The value of each transfer was 25,500 UGX (approximately $10.25) for both food and cash. The intervention started in April 2011, with a baseline survey conducted in Sep-Nov 2010 and an endline survey conducted in Mar-May 2012. The study used four survey instruments in each survey round: 1. Household questionnaire; 2. Child assessment and anthropometry; 3. ECD caregiver questionnaire; and 4. Community questionnaire. The household questionnaire collected detailed household-level information on socioeconomic characteristics and uses of resources, as well as individual-level information including ECD participation, education, and health. The child assessment and anthropometry questionnaire measured child development, anthropometric outcomes, and (only at endline) hemoglobin levels for selected children in the household. The ECD caregiver questionnaire collected information on characteristics of the ECD center’s primary caregiver, experiences running the ECD center, and the ECD center itself. The community questionnaire included information on socioeconomic and demographic characteristics of the community, its access to infrastructure, and a market survey.
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI); UNICEF; World Food Programme (WFP). Washington, DC 2016
The Uganda ECD study was designed as a prospective, cluster-randomized control trial, in which treatment households would receive seven transfers of food or cash on approximately 6-week distribution cycles, conditional on having a child aged 3-5 years participating in an ECD center. The value of each transfer was 25,500 UGX (approximately $10.25) for both food and cash. The intervention started in April 2011, with a baseline survey conducted in Sep-Nov 2010 and an endline survey conducted in Mar-May 2012. The study used four survey instruments in each survey round: 1. Household questionnaire; 2. Child assessment and anthropometry; 3. ECD caregiver questionnaire; and 4. Community questionnaire. The household questionnaire collected detailed household-level information on socioeconomic characteristics and uses of resources, as well as individual-level information including ECD participation, education, and health. The child assessment and anthropometry questionnaire measured child development, anthropometric outcomes, and (only at endline) hemoglobin levels for selected children in the household. The ECD caregiver questionnaire collected information on characteristics of the ECD center’s primary caregiver, experiences running the ECD center, and the ECD center itself. The community questionnaire included information on socioeconomic and demographic characteristics of the community, its access to infrastructure, and a market survey.
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI); Centro de Estudios de Pobalcion y Desarrollo Social(CEPAR); World Food Programme (WFP). Washington, DC 2015
IFPRI conducted an impact evaluation targeted at estimating the relative impact and cost-effectiveness of cash, food vouchers, and food transfers on household food security indicators; as well as complimentary indicators such as household expenditure and female status.
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI); Centro de Estudios de Pobalcion y Desarrollo Social(CEPAR); World Food Programme (WFP). Washington, DC 2015
IFPRI conducted an impact evaluation targeted at estimating the relative impact and cost-effectiveness of cash, food vouchers, and food transfers on household food security indicators; as well as complimentary indicators such as household expenditure and female status.
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC; 2022
This dataset is from the baseline survey conducted between November and December 2019 via in person interviews. In total, the survey includes 4,069 target females between the ages of 14 and 34 years old, 1,169 of their male partners, 4,061 households and 120 villages they reside in. The baseline data is part of a multi-round RCT following target women over time to assess the impact of C’est la vie! in rural Senegal.
Washington, D.C. 2010
Hoddinott, John F.; Roy, Shalini; Karachiwalla, Naureen; Naher, Firdousi; Nisbett, Nick; Tranchant, Jean Pierre. 2013
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2020
International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT); International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA); International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT); World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF);Hombolo Agricultural Research Institute (ARI-Hombolo);Selian Agricultural Research Institute (SARI). Washington, DC 2016
International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI). Washington, DC 2015
International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI). Washington, DC 2015
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2021
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2020
Sampling (SA) – preliminary characteristics of the informal food trader
General Information (ID) – basic demographic, educational and household background information
Employment (EM) – details on current job
Business (BS) – information on business management and the associated fees paid to operate
Taxes and Fees (TX) – range of fees and taxes paid and the benefits received from those payments
Government Engagement (GE) – type and level of interaction between government officials and food traders
Food Safety and Food Security (FS) – awareness of food safety and source of personal food
Service Delivery and Accountability (SD) – services offered in the market and who could best deliver them
Public Participation and Associational Membership (PP) – involvement in different associations and participation in public and community affairs
Household Welfare (HW) – details on household assets and services
Final (FI) – enumerator observations
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2019
The survey is split into 11 survey modules:
1. Sampling (SA) – preliminary characteristics of the informal food trader
2. General Information (ID) – basic demographic, educational and household background information
3. Employment (EM) – details on current job
4. Business (BS) – information on business management and the associated fees paid to operate
5. Taxes and Fees (TX) – range of fees and taxes paid and the benefits received from those payments
6. Government Engagement (GE) – type and level of interaction between government officials and food traders
7. Food Safety and Food Security (FS) – awareness of food safety and source of personal food
8. Service Delivery and Accountability (SD) – services offered in the market and who could best deliver them
9. Public Participation and Associational Membership (PP) – involvement in different associations and participation in public and community affairs
10. Household Welfare (HW) – details on household assets and services
11. Final (FI) – enumerator observations
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI);. Washington, DC 2015
International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA); International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI). Washington, DC 2021
World Vegetable Center (AVRDC). Washington, DC 2015
World Vegetable Center (AVRDC); Ministry of Agriculture Food Security and Cooperatives (MAFC). Washington, DC 2017
World Vegetable Center (AVRDC). Washington, DC 2017
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI);Tinbergen Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam. Washington, DC 2021
preference experiments suggests a preference for early payments, ?eld studies often indicate that farmers will defer regular payments if given the opportunity. In this study, we explicitly test whether farmers are more patient regarding regular, earned income than regarding experimental windfall payments. We asked farmers in a dairy cooperative in Kenya to allocate both their milk income and a one-time gift between an early and a deferred payment date. We ?nd that a large majority of participants deferred their milk payments, while rarely choosing to defer the gift. Participants� survey responses suggest that we observe this di?erence because of mental accounting: participants earmarked their regular milk payments, but not the gift, to save for bulky expenditures. We conclude that deferred payments can provide value to producers by functioning as a savings device, even when decisions over windfall income suggest a preference for early payments. We are sharing the data collected through this experiment as well as our do-files for replication and further analysis purposes.
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, D.C. 2014
International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI). Washington, DC 2019
Washington, D.C. 2004
Washington, D.C. 2005
International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT); International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI); Mekelle University. Washington, DC 2019
International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT). Washington, DC 2020
International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT). Washington, DC 2021
International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA). Washington, DC 2019
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2014
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2020
Sampling (SA) – preliminary characteristics of the informal trader
General Information (ID) – basic demographics, educational and household background information
Tax Attitudes (TX) – range of fees and taxes paid and the benefits received from those payments
Service Delivery and Accountability (SD) – services offered in the market and who could best deliver them
Public Participation and Associational Membership (PP) – involvement in different associations and participation in public and community affairs
Value Chains (VC) – source, frequency, and method of payment for merchandise sold
Social Protection (SP) – plans made for retirement or difficult times
Household Welfare (HW) – details on household assets and services
Final (FI) – enumerator observations
World Vegetable Center (AVRDC). Washington, DC 2017
Selian Agriculture Research Institute (SARI); International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT). Washington, DC 2017
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI); International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT); International Institute for Tropical Agriculture (IITA); International Potato Center (CIP); Michigan State University (MSU). Washington, DC 2019
This research project aims to provide actionable evidence on policy and investment options to accelerate seed system and market development in countries where VPCs are important to food security and agricultural development. By taking a collaborative and multidisciplinary approach to the research, the project (1) analyzes current policy initiatives and success factors underpinning models that incentivize cost-effective multiplication and distribution of VPC seed to smallholders; and (2) develops a set of crop-specific case studies in Kenya, Nigeria, and Vietnam that encourage closer consideration of more appropriate policy options. This document provides a brief summary of the project and accompanies the key informant interview guides to collect data for analysis purposes.
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) . Washington, DC 2015
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2019
This study contains data from the endline survey. The endline survey was conducted in late 2017 and early 2018. The 86 individuals who made up the analytical sample for the baseline survey were contacted again and asked to complete an online questionnaire that replicated three of the five modules from the baseline survey. In total 55 respondents, while the other 12 endline survey respondents were replacements for baseline survey respondents who no longer participate in agriculture and food security policy processes in Malawi. These replacements generally were the current holders of the institutional positions held by the earlier baseline survey respondents.
The endline survey consists of three modules.
Respondent details; influence of institution within policy processes
Opinion on quality of agriculture and food security policy processes in Malawi
Opinion on quality of institutional architecture for agriculture and food security policy processes in Malawi
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2019
This study contains data from the baseline survey. The baseline survey was administered between June and August 2015 to a purposively selected survey sample made of about 100 national level stakeholders in these policy processes. These individuals were asked to complete an online questionnaire that captured their opinions on a range of questions related to the quality of agriculture and food security policy processes at the national level in Malawi. At the end of the baseline survey administration period, responses had been obtained from 86 individuals.
The baseline survey consists of five modules: 1)Respondent details; influence of institution within policy processes; 2)Opinion on quality of agriculture and food security policy processes in Malawi; 3) Opinion on quality of institutional architecture for agriculture and food security policy processes in Malawi; 4) Factors that affect agenda-setting within policy processes on agriculture and food security issues and the design of the policies or programs considered; 5)Participation by respondent in agriculture and food security policy process events.
Washington, D.C. 2004
Ministry of Agriculture, Government of Malawi; United Nations Development Program (UNDP); Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Washington, DC 2021
The soils and agroclimatic maps developed were then overlaid to develop a ‘land unit’ map for Malawi. Each land unit is defined by a unique combination of relatively homogeneous soil and climate properties within its boundaries. These land units were then used with information on the optimal soil and climate conditions for growing a range of rainfed agricultural crops, as well as irrigated rice and tree species, to undertake a spatial suitability analysis for the production of each in each land unit.
The soil survey mapping involved examining soil profiles from several thousand locations across the country between November 1987 and September 1991. The soil surveyors recorded information on the soil profiles and on individual horizons within the soil profiles on standard forms while they were in the field. The data collection forms in paper format were then archived by the Land Husbandry Branch (later renamed Land Resources and Conservation Branch). Soil samples were also collected for chemical analysis. Key professional personnel involved in the collection of the soil profile data included J.A. Eschweiler, S.J. Nanthambwe, S. Paris, J.H. Venema, A.J.M. Lorkeers, R.I. Green, A.E. Kandodo, P. Banda, Mr. Chikowi
Digital records of the soil profile data were not created under the LREP-Malawi project. In 1999, members of the Maize Commodity Team at Chitedze Agricultural Research Station, led by Todd Benson, created digital files of the LREP soil profile and horizon data from the paper field data forms. The majority of the data entry was done by Sophie C. Nambuzi, with assistance from Ivy Ligowe and Maction Komwa. The efforts of the team were generously assisted by Mr. Stephen J. Nanthambwe of the Land Resources and Conservation Branch, who was a participant in the original soil sampling exercise.
Washington, D.C. 2000
Washington, D.C. 2003
Lilongwe University of Agriculture and Natural Resources (LUANAR); Agriculture Extension Services; International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT). Washington, DC 2015
Lilongwe University of Agriculture and Natural Resources (LUANAR); Agriculture Extension Services;Michigan State University (MSU). Washington, DC 2016
World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF); International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT); Lilongwe University of Agriculture and Natural Resources (LUANAR). Washington, DC 2016
World Agroforestry Center (ICRAF);International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT);Lilongwe University of Agriculture & Natural Resources (LUANAR);. Washington, DC 2015
Lilongwe University of Agriculture and Natural Resources (LUANAR); Agriculture Extension Services;Michigan State University (MSU). Washington, DC 2014
Lilongwe University of Agriculture and Natural Resources (LUANAR); Agriculture Extension Services; Michigan State University (MSU). Washington, DC 2015
Wageningen University and Research (WUR). Washington, DC 2015
International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT). Washington, DC 2015
Wageningen University and Research (WUR); International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT). Washington, DC 2015
Wageningen University and Research (WUR); International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT). Washington, DC 2015
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) . Washington, DC 2015
Washington, D.C. 2003
Selian Agricultural Research Institute (SARI); International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA). Washington, DC 2017
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI); University of California (UC), Davis; University of Georgia. Washington, DC 2017
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI); Savannah Agricultural Research Institute, Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) and Ministry of Food and Agriculture. Washington, DC 2016
The survey covered a sample of 1843 farm households and contains data on their demography, farming history, land tenure security, farm land use, input use, crop production and tractor ownership among many others. This survey was designed to provide valid estimates at selected district level and not at regional or national level. Estimates generated from the survey data will be case study results for the sampled districts. Farm level and tractor ownership weight variables need to be used when generating these district estimates, otherwise any statistics without weights should be reported as sample statistics. Since small-scale farmers were not the primary focus of this survey, our random sample for this group is likely to have weak statistical power given that the sample was derived from the representative Ghana Agricultural Production Survey (GAPS) sample. Therefore, any comparison by farm size group should be done with caution and would require ex-post statistical power testing for the small-scale farmer's group.
Washington, D.C. 2000
Washington, D.C. 2002
International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA); International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT); Zambia Agriculture Research Institute (ZARI). Washington, DC 2015
International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI). Washington, DC 2015
International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT); L’Association Malienne d’Eveil au Développement Durable (AMEDD); Institut d'Economie Rurale. Washington, DC 2017
Washington, D.C. 1994
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI); Associacao Nutricao Serguranca Alimentar de Mozambique (ANSA). Washington, DC 2016
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2014
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI); Associacao Nutricao Serguranca Alimentar de Mozambique (ANSA). Washington, DC 2017
In collaboration with Vodacom, IFPRI organized a series of trainings, first at the individual level with farm group leaders carried out in Nampula city in June 2014. This was followed by group trainings at local sites to which all farm group members were invited in July-August 2014. Sampled households (irrespective of whether a member attained training) were then interviewed in August- September 2014 (baseline survey). Input marketing visits were carried out by a local input provider, IKURU from October 2014-January 2015. A follow-up survey was then conducted in October-November 2015 (endline survey).
Both baseline and endline surveys are now available.
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2022
A structured household questionnaire was used to collect household, plot, and individual level data. Questionnaire modules related with access to land, land related legal knowledge, intra-household bargaining power were administered separately for the head and spouse. Hence, a detail gender dis-aggregated data was used to analyze the role social and economic transformations play in dictating the perceived tenure security of individuals with varying social status by comparing the within- and across-household differential effects.
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2022
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2014
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI)
Seed Entrepreneur Association Nepal (SEAN) . Washington, DC 2018
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI)
Seed Entrepreneur Association Nepal (SEAN) . Washington, DC 2018
Washington, D.C. 2005
International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT); Zambian Agriculture Research Institute (ZARI). Washington, DC 2019
International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT); Zambian Agriculture Research Institute (ZARI). Washington, DC 2019
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI); AfricSanté. Washington, DC 2019
(1) behavior change communication on essential nutrition and hygiene actions to improve child nutrition and health-seeking behavior, including for malnutrition;
(2) the provision of a small-quantity lipid-based nutrient supplement (SQ-LNS) to all children to increase intake of essential nutrients (and prevent undernutrition) and to incentivize caregivers to participate regularly in acute malnutrition screening.
The intervention was implemented by Helen Keller International through the national health system. Data were collected by the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) in collaboration with AfricSanté.
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI); AfricSanté. Washington, DC 2019
(1) behavior change communication on essential nutrition and hygiene actions to improve child nutrition and health-seeking behavior, including for malnutrition;
(2) the provision of a small-quantity lipid-based nutrient supplement (SQ-LNS) to all children to increase intake of essential nutrients (and prevent undernutrition) and to incentivize caregivers to participate regularly in acute malnutrition screening.
The intervention was implemented by Helen Keller International through the national health system. Data were collected by the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) in collaboration with AfricSanté.
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI); AfricSanté. Washington, DC 2019
(1) behavior change communication on essential nutrition and hygiene actions to improve child nutrition and health-seeking behavior, including for malnutrition;
(2) the provision of a small-quantity lipid-based nutrient supplement (SQ-LNS) to all children to increase intake of essential nutrients (and prevent undernutrition) and to incentivize caregivers to participate regularly in acute malnutrition screening.
The intervention was implemented by Helen Keller International through the national health system. Data were collected by the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) in collaboration with AfricSanté.
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI); AfricSanté. Washington, DC 2019
(1) behavior change communication on essential nutrition and hygiene actions to improve child nutrition and health-seeking behavior, including for malnutrition;
(2) the provision of a small-quantity lipid-based nutrient supplement (SQ-LNS) to all children to increase intake of essential nutrients (and prevent undernutrition) and to incentivize caregivers to participate regularly in acute malnutrition screening.
The intervention was implemented by Helen Keller International through the national health system. Data were collected by the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) in collaboration with AfricSanté.
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI); AfricSanté. Washington, DC 2019
(1) behavior change communication on essential nutrition and hygiene actions to improve child nutrition and health-seeking behavior, including for malnutrition;
(2) the provision of a small-quantity lipid-based nutrient supplement (SQ-LNS) to all children to increase intake of essential nutrients (and prevent undernutrition) and to incentivize caregivers to participate regularly in acute malnutrition screening.
The intervention was implemented by Helen Keller International through the national health system. Data were collected by the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) in collaboration with AfricSanté.
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI); AfricSanté. Washington, DC 2019
(1) behavior change communication on essential nutrition and hygiene actions to improve child nutrition and health-seeking behavior, including for malnutrition;
(2) the provision of a small-quantity lipid-based nutrient supplement (SQ-LNS) to all children to increase intake of essential nutrients (and prevent undernutrition) and to incentivize caregivers to participate regularly in acute malnutrition screening.
The intervention was implemented by Helen Keller International through the national health system. Data were collected by the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) in collaboration with AfricSanté.
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI); AfricSanté. Washington, DC 2019
The intervention was implemented by Helen Keller International through the national health system. Data were collected by the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) in collaboration with AfricSanté.
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI); AfricSanté. Washington, DC 2019
The intervention was implemented by Helen Keller International through the national health system. Data were collected by the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) in collaboration with AfricSanté.
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI); AfricSanté. Washington, DC 2019
The intervention was implemented by Helen Keller International through the national health system. Data were collected by the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) in collaboration with AfricSanté.
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI); AfricSanté. Washington, DC 2019
The intervention was implemented by Helen Keller International through the national health system. Data were collected by the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) in collaboration with AfricSanté.
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI); AfricSanté. Washington, DC 2019
The intervention was implemented by Helen Keller International through the national health system. Data were collected by the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) in collaboration with AfricSanté.
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI); AfricSanté. Washington, DC 2019
The intervention was implemented by Helen Keller International through the national health system. Data were collected by the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) in collaboration with AfricSanté.
Washington, D.C. 2000
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI); Innovative Development Strategies (IDS). Washington, DC 2016
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) . Washington, DC 2017
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI); Innovative Development Strategies (IDS). Washington, DC 2014
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI); Innovative Development Strategies (Pvt) Ltd.; National Institute of Genomics and Advanced Biotechnology (NIGAB), National Agricultural Research Center (NARC); Office of Research, Innovation, and Commercialization (ORIC), University of Agriculture Faisalabad (UAF); Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Agriculture Faisalabad (UAF). Washington, DC 2016
The collection, tests, and analysis of the cotton tissue (leaves and bolls) was led by the University of Agriculture, Faisalabad (UAF), and the National Institute for Genomics and Advanced Biotechnology (NIGAB), Islamabad, in collaboration with International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), and Innovative Development Studies. Two different tests were carried out. The first one was the strip test that test for the presence or absence of the Cry1Ac protein. The second was the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) that quantifies the expression level of this protein. Two rounds of tests were conducted, the first at approximately 70 days after sowing (DAS) and the second at approximately 120 DAS. The resultant dataset combines information from 593 sampled households with corresponding plant tissue diagnostics from 70 DAS, as well as information from 589 sampled households with corresponding diagnostics from 120 DAS.
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI); Innovative Development Strategies (Pvt) Ltd.; National Institute of Genomics and Advanced Biotechnology (NIGAB), National Agricultural Research Center (NARC); Office of Research, Innovation, and Commercialization (ORIC), University of Agriculture Faisalabad (UAF); Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Agriculture Faisalabad (UAF). Washington, DC 2016
The survey was designed by the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) and implemented by Innovative Development Studies (IDS). It collected data on household, farm and plot characteristics of cotton growers. Data were collected in face-to-face interviews with 728 farmers who were selected in a statistically representative sample of all cotton-growing agroclimatic zones in both Punjab and Sindh Provinces, accounting for more than 99 percent of the cotton cultivated in Pakistan. The first round was implemented between March-May in 2013, soon after participants planted cotton.
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI); Innovative Development Strategies (Pvt) Ltd.; National Institute of Genomics and Advanced Biotechnology (NIGAB), National Agricultural Research Center (NARC); Office of Research, Innovation, and Commercialization (ORIC), University of Agriculture Faisalabad (UAF); Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Agriculture Faisalabad (UAF). Washington, DC 2016
The survey was designed by the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) and implemented by Innovative Development Studies (IDS). It collected data related to input use and pesticide poisoning symptoms up to the first picking of cotton. Round 1.2 was implemented between September-November in 2013, during or immediately following the first picking. Data were collected from the households sampled in Round 1.1. Of the original sample of 728 households, 46 chose not to grow cotton in kharif 2013, 70 lost their crops to flood or other natural disasters, four migrated and eight dropped out in the second- or third-round surveys.
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI); Innovative Development Strategies (Pvt) Ltd.; National Institute of Genomics and Advanced Biotechnology (NIGAB), National Agricultural Research Center (NARC); Office of Research, Innovation, and Commercialization (ORIC), University of Agriculture Faisalabad (UAF); Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Agriculture Faisalabad (UAF). Washington, DC 2016
The survey was designed by the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) and implemented by Innovative Development Studies (IDS). It collected data on the harvest from each picking and the total sales of cotton. Round 1.3 was implemented between January-February in 2014, immediately after the last harvest. Data were collected from the households sampled in Round 1.1. Of the original sample of 728 households, 46 chose not to grow cotton in kharif 2013, 70 lost their crops to flood or other natural disasters, four migrated and eight dropped out in the second- or third-round surveys.
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI); Innovative Development Strategies (IDS). Washington, DC 2015
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI); Innovative Development Strategies (Pvt) Ltd.; National Institute of Genomics and Advanced Biotechnology (NIGAB), National Agricultural Research Center (NARC); Office of Research, Innovation, and Commercialization (ORIC), University of Agriculture Faisalabad (UAF); Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Agriculture Faisalabad (UAF). Washington, DC 2016
The survey was designed by the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) and implemented by Innovative Development Studies (IDS). The sample selection of seed dealers involved three steps: i) identification of markets from where most of the survey households in our sample for the study purchase seeds; ii) preparation of a list of all cotton seed dealers in these identified markets; and iii) selection of five seed dealers in each market and collect samples of three top selling varieties.
The household survey identified that nearly 32 percent of the selected cotton growers purchased seeds from markets. These markets were located in 42 tehsils. Keeping in view the representation of all agroecological zones (AEZs) of cotton growing areas, 27 tehsil markets were randomly selected. A list of cotton seed dealers and cotton varieties that they purchased to sell in (kharif) 2015 were prepared in the selected tehsil markets. A cotton seed dealer is defined as a vendor of cotton seed. From the dealer listing, five seed dealers were selected randomly and subsequently top three selling cotton seed varieties per dealer were selected. In total, we had 135 seed dealers in our sample. A structured questionnaire was administered to collect information on the sale, purchase, and inventory of cotton seed varieties. Seeds of selected three cotton varieties were collected from each seed dealer. In total seeds of 404 cotton seed samples were collected. These samples were packed in bags and sent to the University of Agriculture, Faisalabad for DNA fingerprinting.
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2019
1. Household characteristics (demographics, education, migration, etc.)
2. Agricultural production (crop production, use of household labor, etc.)
3. Household assets (production equipment and consumer durables, livestock ownership, and housing quality)
4. Income apart from own agricultural activities (wage employment, own business activities, and income transfers and gifts)
5. Consumption and expenditures (nonfood expenditures, food consumption, and dietary diversity)
6. Economic shocks and food insecurity (perceptions of poverty, recent food insecurity, and health and nutrition extension)
7. Gender roles and social expectations (asked separately for men and women)
8. Female health (pregnancy care and breastfeeding practices)
9. Child health (healthcare, vaccinations, and anthropometry)
International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI); International Potato Center (CIP); Wageningen University & Research. Washington, DC 2019
International Potato Center (CIP); International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT); International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas (ICARDA). Washington, DC 2015
Lilongwe University of Agriculture and Natural Resources. Washington, DC 2021
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2019
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2019
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2019
Washington, D.C. 2000
Washington, D.C. 2008
Washington, DC 2005
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2019
To make the data from this formative evaluation publicly available, we are sharing a site-level dataset (with approximate GPS coordinates, precision of ~10km, and information on yields, damage visible in the pictures as assessed by experts, and whether data triggered insurance payouts) and a picture-level dataset (with information on the timing and frequency of pictures taken, as well as approximate GPS coordinates of pictures taken, precision of ~10km).
Lilongwe University of Agriculture and Natural Resources (LUANAR); Agriculture Extension Services; Michigan State University (MSU). Washington, DC 2015
International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT); Zambian Agriculture Research Institute (ZARI). Washington, DC 2019
International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT); Zambian Agriculture Research Institute (ZARI). Washington, DC 2021
Washington, D.C. 2005
Washington, D.C. 2003
Ruel, Marie T.;. 2010
Lilongwe University of Agriculture and Natural Resources (LUANAR); Agriculture Extension Services; Michigan State University (MSU). Washington, DC 2017
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2022
This dataset is from the baseline survey conducted from September 2014–February 2015, before the start of the program across 5 regions of Mali. The baseline sample was designed to be representative of Jigisemejiri beneficiaries with a child 6-23 months old. In total, 3,175 households across the 96 communes were planned to be sampled at baseline. Due to security concerns, 6 communes in Mopti were not sampled, leading to 3,080 households across 90 communes that were actually sampled in the baseline data.
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2022
International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT); Selian Agricultural Research Institute (SARI). Washington, DC 2016
International Potato Center (CIP). Washington, DC 2014
International Potato Center (CIP). Washington, DC 2014
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2021
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, D.C. 2014
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, D.C. 2013
International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA); Savanna Agricultural Research Institute (SARI). Washington, DC 2015
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2021
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2021
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2021
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2021
Wageningen University and Research (WUR). Washington, DC 2014
Wageningen University and Research (WUR); International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT). Washington, DC 2014
International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT); Wageningen University and Research (WUR). Washington, DC 2014
Wageningen University and Research (WUR). Washington, DC 2017
HarvestChoice, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2016
HarvestPlus, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI); International Potato Center (CIP). Washington, DC 2015
HarvestPlus collaborated with the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) and the International Potato Center (CIP) to design and implement a randomized-controlled evaluation during the implementation of the REU project in each country. The point of intervention for the REU project included local farmer groups in Uganda and more loosely organized community or church-based groups in Mozambique. Before the intervention, these groups were sampled for the evaluation study and group members with young children were randomly selected for the evaluation household sample. Baseline surveys were conducted in the sampled church groups in Mozambique in 2006. The baseline included a detailed socioeconomic and agricultural survey as well as a nutrition and dietary intake survey. The dietary intake survey included 24-hour dietary recall interviews to measure intakes of vitamin A and other nutrients of target groups of young children and women in the sample. As a basis for identifying impact through the evaluation, sampled farmer groups or church groups were randomly assigned into one of three intervention arms: the intensive 2-3 year intervention (Model 1), a less intensive intervention with reduced activity after the first year (Model 2) and a Control group. In 2009, endline surveys were conducted in Mozambique, and in 2012, the communities were visited a third time, three years after the intervention had left.
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2022
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2020
The surveys were conducted in Rabi season, 2018-19, and collected data on cultivation practices, the use of chemical inputs including micronutrients over Kharif 2018 and Rabi 2018-19, and awareness about micronutrient benefits from farmers. The surveys of extension workers and fertilizer dealers included questions on the main roles and responsibilities and issues faced in the implementation of the micronutrient subsidy scheme.
The data files included are raw data generated from the survey. The "Analysis" do-file will generate constructed variables from the raw data which are described in the S1 Table of the paper. The remaining results, figures (Fig 1-6), and tables (Table 2, Table 3, Table 4, S2 Table) used in the paper can also be reproduced running this do file.
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2021
Baseline data were collected between November 2015 and January 2016. Endline data were collected between January and March 2018. In each household, both the primary female beneficiary and primary male beneficiary were interviewed. Although the male and female beneficiaries were interviewed separately, some modules were answered by only the male (e.g., household demographics, assets and wealth, agricultural production, non-food consumption, and expenditures), some were answered by only the female (e.g., food consumption and food security indicators, dietary data, anthropometry, women’s status and decision-making autonomy, the experience of IPV), and some were answered separately by each (e.g., data needed to construct the Women’s Empowerment in Agriculture Index (WEAI), gender attitudes, time preferences, agency). Several modules related to empowerment, gender attitudes, IPV, and experience with the program were administered only at endline. In the case of empowerment, the pro-WEAI (Malapit et al. 2019) [https://doi.org/10.1111/dpr.12374] was administered at endline but was not available at baseline as it was still under development; instead, at baseline, the abbreviated WEAI (A-WEAI, see Malapit et al. 2017) [http://ebrary.ifpri.org/cdm/ref/collection/p15738coll2/id/131231] was fielded. Questions on gender attitudes and IPV were motivated in part by the Nurturing Connections curriculum, which was made available after baseline, thus were included only at endline.
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2020
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2020
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2021
All the data and script should be placed in one folder. Add a R project into the folder (for example, "project_ldfDemand.Rproj"). Open the R project before running the scripts.
The scripts (extension .R) are ordered sequentially, and should be run sequentially for the first time. The script "22masterFile.R" is the master file that runs all scripts sequentially from start to finish.
The study generated simulation results in GAMS. The GAMS code is not part of the scripts in this dataset. Please direct any questions on the GAMS code and input data to Adam Komarek (a.komarek@uq.edu.au)
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI); University of Washington. Washington, DC 2021
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2020
Stein, Alexander J.. Washington, D.C. 2013
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2020
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2021
up to 2013, up to 25 percent of households exited the sample; in 2013, an entirely new sample was selected. There are on average three observations per household each year, and the median household is in the sample for four years. In total data from 164,997 individuals from 14934 households were used for the analysis.
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2019
Data collection at baseline and follow-up were done at participants’ homes through face-to-face interviews. A pre-coded survey was administered to the expectant mother immediately after enrollment, her height and weight were measured, and self-reported month of pregnancy was recorded. Expectant mothers were also asked to provide a venous blood sample to be analyzed for serum aflatoxin. A similar survey was repeated during follow-up data collection at 24 months after enrollment. Participants enrolled in the fourth through sixth waves were additionally followed-up 24 months after the third enrollment wave. At each follow-up visit, the length and weight of the child in utero at baseline (reference child) were recorded, and a venous blood sample was taken from this child for serum aflatoxin analysis.
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2021
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC; 2018
Household survey data collected as part of the Africa Research In Sustainable Intensification for the Next Generation (Africa RISING) program, along with secondary data from journal articles and the Malawian Agricultural Market Information System, as well as other biophysical and economic data have been harmonized and analyzed using Stata. Stata do files have been created for data processing and analysis as noted in the "Documentation" file included in this study.
HarvestChoice, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2016
HarvestChoice, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2016
Agriculture Research Institutes (ARI). Washington, DC 2016
International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT); International Water Management Institute (IWMI); Ethiopian Institute of Water Resources (EIWR); Addis Adaba University (AAU); Mekelle University (MU). Washington, DC 2018
Washington, D.C. 2010
Washington, D.C. 2010
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2020
The survey took place shortly after the main cropping season (meher) harvest over a five-week period in November and December 2011, interviewing 850 households. The data collected includes household demographics, land and agricultural production, housing quality and household assets, input access, expenditures and consumption, and anthropometrics of mother and children among others.
Washington, D.C. 2006
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2021
HealthBridge Canada; HarvestPlus, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI); Butare Teaching Hospital, National University of Rwanda . Washington, DC 2018
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2014
International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA); Savanna Agricultural Research Institute (SARI). Washington, DC 2015
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2022
HarvestChoice, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2017
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI); GRET; Université Gaston Berger (UGB); Cellule de Lutte contre la Malnutrition (CLM). Washington, DC 2017
Washington, DC 2006
L'Association Malienne d'Eveil au Developpement Durable (AMEDD); World Vegetable Center (AVRDC); International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT). Washington, DC 2015
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2022
The Land Use and Land Cover (LULC) classes consist of nine natural vegetation categories (barren, savanna, deciduous/mixed, evergreen broadleaf forest, evergreen needleleaf forest, grassland, shrubland, tundra, and woody savanna) and twelve cropland categories (rainfed and irrigated for maize, rice, sorghum, soybeans, wheat, and all other crops). Three different data sources were used to estimate the natural vegetation component and each result simulation is reported separately. One set of cases indicates the potential area for the natural vegetation classes if there were no cropland. The second set includes cropland and thus the natural vegetation areas are reduced. The total cropland areas are derived from the IMPACT model with adjustments made for multi-cropping.
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2019
The survey covers 71 tractor owners in Benue states. The survey captures information regarding the nature of tractor usages, hiring business operations, evolutionary histories, and what challenges they have been able to overcome or continue to face.
Department of Environmental Studies, New York University; International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI); Lilongwe University of Agriculture and Natural Resources. Washington, DC 2018
Channing Arndt (Purdue University); Antonio Cruz (Ministry of Planning and Finance, Mozambique); Henning Tarp Jensen (University of Copenhagen); Sherman Robinson (International Food Policy Research Institute); Finn Tarp (University of Copenhagen). Washington, D.C. 1995
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2021
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI); Department of Environmental Studies, New York University. Washington, DC; 2018
International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT); International Water Management Institute (IWMI); Ethiopian Institute of Water Resources (EIWR); Addis Adaba University (AAU); Mekelle University (MU). Washington, DC 2018
International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT). Washington, DC 2019
International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT); Selian Agricultural Research Institute (SARI). Washington, DC 2015
Ringler, Claudia; Sun, Yan. Washington, D.C. 2010
Washington, D.C. 2000
Thurlow, James; van Seventer, Dirk Ernst;. Washington, DC 2002
Washington, D.C. 2005
HarvestChoice, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI); Association for Strengthening Agricultural Research in Eastern and Central Africa. Washington, DC 2017
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2020
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2013
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2010
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2019
The data were compiled from multiple sources, including the International Monetary Fund, the World Bank, and national governments, and conducted extensive data checks and adjustments to ensure consistent spending measurements over time that are free of exchange-rate fluctuations and currency denomination changes.
SPEED is a user-friendly tool that could help governments to better allocate their resources to be consistent with their policy objectives, and citizens’ needs and priorities. Because of the wide coverage of time periods, countries, and sectors, it could help policymakers and researchers to better understand the linkages between different types of public expenditure and development. It could also help examine historical trends and compare those to other countries.
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2018
Policy makers, researchers, and other stakeholders can use this robust database to examine both historical trends and the allocation of government resources across sectors. It also allows for comparisons with other countries within a region or at a similar level of development. Because the SPEED database covers many countries for a long time period, it allows analysts of government spending to examine national policy priorities, as reflected in the allocation of public expenditures, and track development goals and the cost-effectiveness of public spending both within and across countries.
Indicators reported in this data study include total agricultural expenditure, agricultural spending per capita, and the ratio of agricultural spending to agricultural gross domestic product (GDP) for years 1980, 1995, and 2014. IFPRI researchers have compiled data from multiple sources, including the International Monetary Fund, World Bank, United Nations, and national governments, and conducted extensive data checks and adjustments to ensure consistent spending measurements over time that are free of exchange-rate fluctuations and currency denomination changes.
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2019
Policymakers, researchers, and other stakeholders can use this robust database to examine both historical trends and the allocation of government resources across sectors. It also allows for comparisons with other countries within a region or at a similar level of development. Because the SPEED database covers many countries for a long time period, it allows analysts of government spending to examine national policy priorities, as reflected in the allocation of public expenditures, and track development goals and the cost-effectiveness of public spending both within and across countries.
Indicators reported in this data study include total agricultural expenditure, agricultural spending per capita, and the ratio of agricultural spending to the agricultural gross domestic product (GDP) for years 1995, 2000, and 2016. IFPRI researchers have compiled data from multiple sources, including the International Monetary Fund, World Bank, United Nations, and national governments, and conducted extensive data checks and adjustments to ensure consistent spending measurements over time that are free of exchange-rate fluctuations and currency denomination changes.
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2022
Total expense (expense) which is the sum of all economic categories listed below
Compensation of employees (comp_emp): Compensation of employees is the total remuneration, in cash or in kind, payable to an individual in an employer-employee relationship in return for work performed by the latter during the reporting period… Compensation of employees comprises wages and salaries and employers’ social contributions payable by employers on behalf of employees to social insurance schemes (IMF 2014, pages 115 and 116).
Consumption of fixed capital (cons_cap): Consumption of fixed capital is the decline, during the course of the reporting period, in the current value of the stock of fixed assets owned and used by a government unit as a result of physical deterioration, normal obsolescence, or normal accidental damage (IMF 2014, pages 124-125).
Grants expense (gt_exp): Grants expenses are transfers payable by government units to other resident or nonresident government units or international organizations and that do not meet the definition of a tax, subsidy, or social contribution (IMF, page 134).
Grants expense to foreign government (gt_exp_for)
Grants expense to other general government (gt_exp_gov)
Grants expense to international organization (gt_exp_int)
Interest expense (int_exp): Interest expense is a form of investment income that is receivable by the owners of certain kinds of financial assets (SDRs, deposits, debt securities, loans, and other accounts receivable) for putting these financial and other resources at the disposal of another institutional unit (IMF, page 127).
Interest expense to other general government (int_exp_gov)
Interest expense to non-residents (int_exp_nr)
Interest expense to residents other than general government (int_exp_res)
Other expense (ot_exp): Other expense comprises property expense other than interest, transfers not elsewhere classified, and amounts payable in respect of premiums, fees, and claims payable related to nonlife insurance and standardized guarantees (IMF, page 137).
Social benefits expense (soc_exp): Social benefits expense are current transfers receivable by households intended to provide for the needs that arise from social risks—for example, sickness, unemployment, retirement, housing, education, or family circumstances (IMF, page 13).
Subsidies expense (sub_exp): Subsidies expense are current unrequited transfers that government units make to enterprises on the basis of the level of their production activities or the quantities or values of the goods or services they produce, sell, export, or import (IMF, page 131).
Subsidies expense to other sectors (sub_oth)
Use of goods and services (use_gs): Use of goods and services consists of the value of goods and services used for the production of market and nonmarket goods and services (IMF 2014, page 120).
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2015
Against this background, the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) launched and made publicly available the Statistics on Public Expenditures for Economic Development (SPEED) database in 2010. The database aims to provide policymakers, researchers, and the broader development community with the most comprehensive public expenditure information. This is the third major update of the dataset since 2010 (the second major update was made available in 2013). This third update includes an expanded time coverage, 1980 to 2012, and an additional economic sector, fuels and energy. While data were not always available for all the 147 countries included in the dataset, significant efforts were made in updating the data for as many countries as possible.
This 2015 version includes a total of ten sectors: agriculture, communication, education, defense, health, mining, social protection, fuel and energy, transport, and transport and communication (as a group). Prior to 1990, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) presented the expenditures on transport and communications as one combined sector. Since 1990, the expenditures have been reported separately as two sectors. The new version of the SPEED dataset presents the expenditures on the two sectors separately as well as combined for completeness of information.
HarvestChoice, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2016
HarvestChoice, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI); Association for Strengthening Agricultural Research in Eastern and Central Africa. Washington, DC 2017
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2022
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2021
International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI). Washington, DC 2014
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI); University of California, Davis; Nutridemics. Washington, DC 2015
International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT); Zambia Agricultural Research Institute (ZARI); Grassroots Trust; Catholic Relief Services (CRS). Washington, DC 2016
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2019
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2019
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2019
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, D.C 2014
International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI). Washington, DC 2020
International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI); Hawassa University. Washington, DC 2019
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2015
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2014
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI);
Ethiopian Development Research Institute (EDRI). Washington, DC 2020
International Institute for Tropical Agriculture (IITA); World Vegetable Center (AVRDC); Savanna Agricultural Research Institute (SARI). Washington, DC 2015
International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA); Savanna Agricultural Research Institute (SARI). Washington, DC 2015
International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT); International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas (ICARDA); International Potato Center (CIP);International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI). Washington, DC 2017
Washington, DC 2002
HarvestPlus, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI); University of California, Davis; International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research (ICDDR), Bangladesh. Washington, DC 2017
International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI). Washington, DC 2018
Ruel, Marie T.; Rawat, Rahul; Somda, Jean-Celestin. 2014
Ruel, Marie T.; Rawat, Rahul; Savadogo, Abdoul Salam. 2015
HarvestPlus, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI); Academy for Educational Development (AED). Washington, DC 2017
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI); Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS); Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs;Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS);. Washington, DC 2018
The national cotton pests monitoring network, maintained by the Ministry of Agriculture mandates the main cotton-producing counties to collect yearly data on pest infestation levels and insecticide applications for key cotton pests following national standardized monitoring and categorization methods. Tailored scouting methods were used for different pests. In each county, 10–20 fields were selected for pest monitoring in each year. Insect populations were recorded every 3–10 days from early June to late August each year, and the seasonal average abundance across the surveyed fields were used for scoring using a five-point scale of levels I–V. Data on the number of insecticide applications targeted at specific pests were collected by interviewing farmers at each scouting to estimate yearly pest-specific total number of sprays for each county. While the detailed data collection methods and protocols should inspire confidence in the data, the reliability of the pest level data depends on the accuracy, knowledge, and honesty of the respondents, as is the case with any non–first-hand data.
County-level land use data were drawn from a national land cover/use database developed by the Chinese Academy of Sciences, using satellite remote-sensing data from the Landsat Thematic Mapper/Enhanced Thematic Mapper images. The database offers the most comprehensive coverage of China’s land use/cover and has been used in a number of published studies. The land use data for 6 years (1990-2015) at 5 years interval were extracted. The proportional area for each six main land use classes as well as the Shannon index for land use diversity for each county for six years was computed. Land use proportions in the intermediate years (e.g., 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994, 1996, etc.) were calculated by linear interpolation between the data.
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2021
The North-Eastern region of Nigeria was renowned for its large agricultural potential, with 80 percent of the population engaged in farming and contributing significantly to the regional and national GDP. Over the past two decades, however, the region had regressed with low education levels, limited access to healthcare and other basic amenities, and low GDP per capita. A once-promising zone now trails the other regions of Nigeria across all socio-economic indicators. The NE region in most recent times has also borne the brunt of human casualty, loss of properties, and diminished livelihoods emanating from the Boko Haram terrorist insurgency.
Towards the end of the project activities in 2018, IFPRI was contracted by the National Fadama Coordination Office (NFCO) in Abuja Nigeria which was the project implementing agency on behalf of the Government of Nigeria and World Bank to conduct an endline survey to collect primary data that would be used in rigorous impact assessment hence this data set. The endline survey collected both the project endline data ( 2018 measurements) and the retrospective baseline data ( 2016 measurements). The sample household survey covered all the six states in North-Eastern Nigeria that received project financial support. A total of 1800 households were sampled in both project treatment communities and non-project control communities.
The Survey data has information on insecurity conflicts and how these insecurity conflicts impacted on household migration and socio-economic conditions, humanitarian support received, value addition and agricultural processing, agricultural input aid received, demographic characteristics, crop production, livestock production, non-farm income, Fishing, and Aquaculture Income, beekeeping income, forestry and agroforestry income, wildlife income, food insecurity assessment, household dietary diversity, access to marketing infrastructure, productive assets, non-productive assets, access to credit, access to market information and extension.
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2021
This data was collected by IFPRI as part of the World Bank-funded project (Fadama III–Additional Financing (AF II) phase II ) that was implemented in North-Eastern Nigeria. The Project was supporting the recovery of the agriculture sector in the North East (NE) of Nigeria in response to support the Government’s recovery and reconstruction initiative. The project sought to respond to the urgent food and livelihood needs of farming households who were affected by conflicts in the six North-East states in Nigeria—Borno, Yobe, Adamawa, Taraba, Bauchi, and Gombe. The North East States suffered huge losses and damage to property, economic infrastructure, and livelihoods because of the insurgency. Among the participating communities and households, the project was intended to improve nutritional security, food security, household incomes, boost job creation, improve infrastructure and increase access to market information as well as enhancing the managerial capacities of the local communities.
The North-Eastern region of Nigeria was renowned for its large agricultural potential, with 80 percent of the population engaged in farming and contributing significantly to the regional and national GDP. Over the past two decades, however, the region had regressed with low education levels, limited access to healthcare and other basic amenities, and low GDP per capita. A once-promising zone now trails the other regions of Nigeria across all socio-economic indicators. The NE region in most recent times has also borne the brunt of human casualty, loss of properties, and diminished livelihoods emanating from the Boko Haram terrorist insurgency.
Towards the end of the project activities in 2018, IFPRI was contracted by the National Fadama Coordination Office (NFCO) in Abuja Nigeria which was the project implementing agency on behalf of the Government of Nigeria and World Bank to conduct an endline survey to collect primary data that would be used in rigorous impact assessment hence this data set. The endline survey collected both the project endline data ( 2018 measurements) and the retrospective baseline data ( 2016 measurements). The sample household survey covered all the six states in North-Eastern Nigeria that received project financial support. A total of 1800 households were sampled in both project treatment communities and non-project control communities.
The Survey data has information on insecurity conflicts and how these insecurity conflicts impacted on household migration and socio-economic conditions, humanitarian support received, value addition and agricultural processing, agricultural input aid received, demographic characteristics, crop production, livestock production, non-farm income, Fishing, and Aquaculture Income, beekeeping income, forestry and agroforestry income, wildlife income, food insecurity assessment, household dietary diversity, access to marketing infrastructure, productive assets, non-productive assets, access to credit, access to market information and extension.
The data included is here for the Bauchi state.
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2021
The North-Eastern region of Nigeria was renowned for its large agricultural potential, with 80 percent of the population engaged in farming and contributing significantly to the regional and national GDP. Over the past two decades, however, the region had regressed with low education levels, limited access to healthcare and other basic amenities, and low GDP per capita. A once-promising zone now trails the other regions of Nigeria across all socio-economic indicators. The NE region in most recent times has also borne the brunt of human casualty, loss of properties, and diminished livelihoods emanating from the Boko Haram terrorist insurgency.
Towards the end of the project activities in 2018, IFPRI was contracted by the National Fadama Coordination Office (NFCO) in Abuja Nigeria which was the project implementing agency on behalf of the Government of Nigeria and World Bank to conduct an endline survey to collect primary data that would be used in rigorous impact assessment hence this data set. The endline survey collected both the project endline data ( 2018 measurements) and the retrospective baseline data ( 2016 measurements). The sample household survey covered all the six states in North-Eastern Nigeria that received project financial support. A total of 1800 households were sampled in both project treatment communities and non-project control communities.
The Survey data has information on insecurity conflicts and how these insecurity conflicts impacted on household migration and socio-economic conditions, humanitarian support received, value addition and agricultural processing, agricultural input aid received, demographic characteristics, crop production, livestock production, non-farm income, Fishing, and Aquaculture Income, beekeeping income, forestry and agroforestry income, wildlife income, food insecurity assessment, household dietary diversity, access to marketing infrastructure, productive assets, non-productive assets, access to credit, access to market information and extension.
The data included is here for the Borno state.
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2021
The North-Eastern region of Nigeria was renowned for its large agricultural potential, with 80 percent of the population engaged in farming and contributing significantly to the regional and national GDP. Over the past two decades, however, the region had regressed with low education levels, limited access to healthcare and other basic amenities, and low GDP per capita. A once-promising zone now trails the other regions of Nigeria across all socio-economic indicators. The NE region in most recent times has also borne the brunt of human casualty, loss of properties, and diminished livelihoods emanating from the Boko Haram terrorist insurgency.
Towards the end of the project activities in 2018, IFPRI was contracted by the National Fadama Coordination Office (NFCO) in Abuja Nigeria which was the project implementing agency on behalf of the Government of Nigeria and World Bank to conduct an endline survey to collect primary data that would be used in rigorous impact assessment hence this data set. The endline survey collected both the project endline data ( 2018 measurements) and the retrospective baseline data ( 2016 measurements). The sample household survey covered all the six states in North-Eastern Nigeria that received project financial support. A total of 1800 households were sampled in both project treatment communities and non-project control communities.
The Survey data has information on insecurity conflicts and how these insecurity conflicts impacted on household migration and socio-economic conditions, humanitarian support received, value addition and agricultural processing, agricultural input aid received, demographic characteristics, crop production, livestock production, non-farm income, Fishing, and Aquaculture Income, beekeeping income, forestry and agroforestry income, wildlife income, food insecurity assessment, household dietary diversity, access to marketing infrastructure, productive assets, non-productive assets, access to credit, access to market information and extension.
The data included is here for the Gombe state.
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2021
The North-Eastern region of Nigeria was renowned for its large agricultural potential, with 80 percent of the population engaged in farming and contributing significantly to the regional and national GDP. Over the past two decades, however, the region had regressed with low education levels, limited access to healthcare and other basic amenities, and low GDP per capita. A once-promising zone now trails the other regions of Nigeria across all socio-economic indicators. The NE region in most recent times has also borne the brunt of human casualty, loss of properties, and diminished livelihoods emanating from the Boko Haram terrorist insurgency.
Towards the end of the project activities in 2018, IFPRI was contracted by the National Fadama Coordination Office (NFCO) in Abuja Nigeria which was the project implementing agency on behalf of the Government of Nigeria and World Bank to conduct an endline survey to collect primary data that would be used in rigorous impact assessment hence this data set. The endline survey collected both the project endline data ( 2018 measurements) and the retrospective baseline data ( 2016 measurements). The sample household survey covered all the six states in North-Eastern Nigeria that received project financial support. A total of 1800 households were sampled in both project treatment communities and non-project control communities.
The Survey data has information on insecurity conflicts and how these insecurity conflicts impacted on household migration and socio-economic conditions, humanitarian support received, value addition and agricultural processing, agricultural input aid received, demographic characteristics, crop production, livestock production, non-farm income, Fishing, and Aquaculture Income, beekeeping income, forestry and agroforestry income, wildlife income, food insecurity assessment, household dietary diversity, access to marketing infrastructure, productive assets, non-productive assets, access to credit, access to market information and extension.
The data included is here for theTaraba state.
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2021
The North-Eastern region of Nigeria was renowned for its large agricultural potential, with 80 percent of the population engaged in farming and contributing significantly to the regional and national GDP. Over the past two decades, however, the region had regressed with low education levels, limited access to healthcare and other basic amenities, and low GDP per capita. A once-promising zone now trails the other regions of Nigeria across all socio-economic indicators. The NE region in most recent times has also borne the brunt of human casualty, loss of properties, and diminished livelihoods emanating from the Boko Haram terrorist insurgency.
Towards the end of the project activities in 2018, IFPRI was contracted by the National Fadama Coordination Office (NFCO) in Abuja Nigeria which was the project implementing agency on behalf of the Government of Nigeria and World Bank to conduct an endline survey to collect primary data that would be used in rigorous impact assessment hence this data set. The endline survey collected both the project endline data ( 2018 measurements) and the retrospective baseline data ( 2016 measurements). The sample household survey covered all the six states in North-Eastern Nigeria that received project financial support. A total of 1800 households were sampled in both project treatment communities and non-project control communities.
The Survey data has information on insecurity conflicts and how these insecurity conflicts impacted on household migration and socio-economic conditions, humanitarian support received, value addition and agricultural processing, agricultural input aid received, demographic characteristics, crop production, livestock production, non-farm income, Fishing, and Aquaculture Income, beekeeping income, forestry and agroforestry income, wildlife income, food insecurity assessment, household dietary diversity, access to marketing infrastructure, productive assets, non-productive assets, access to credit, access to market information and extension.
The data included is here for the Yobe state.
Plant Production Systems (PPS), Wageningen University (WUR). Washington, DC 2020
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, D.C. 2012
The data file provides estimates of IFPRI's TFP and PFP measures for developing countries for three-sub-periods between 1990 and 2011(1991-2000,2001-2007 and 2008-2013). These TFP and PFP estimates were generated using data from the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) on outputs and inputs. The output values are the FAO-constructed gross agricultural outputs, measured in constant 2004-2006 US dollars and smoothed using the Hodrick-Prescott filter. Each output v alue is a composite of 190 crop and livestock commodities aggregated using a constant set of global average prices from 2004-2006. Inputs include agricultural land, measured by the sum, in hectares, of cropland and permanent pasture; labor, measured by the number of animals in cattle equivalents; machinery, measured by the total amount of horsepower available from four-wheel tractors, pedestrian-operated tractors, and combine-threshers in use; and fertilizer, measured by tons of fertilizer nutrients used. The dataset of outputs and inputs was checked and cleaned using different statistical techniques.
TFP estimates were obtained using Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) techniques. These techniques have been extensively used because they make TFPs easy to compute, do not involve restrictive assumptions regarding economic behavior, such as cost minimization or profit maximization. On the other hand, DEA productivity estimates are sensitive to data noise and outliers and can suffer from the probel of ""unusual"" weights that are higher or lower than expected when aggregating inputs to meas ure TFP. Given these limitations, outlier detection methods were used to determine influential observations in the dataset and input weights were allowed to vary only within a certain range of expected values because specific lower and upper bounds were imposed for each input in different regions. Results are also afected by data characteristics and quality issues. In particular, the data series on fertilizer and machinery show high volatility and could result in high variablity of TFP estimates for some countries.
Ahmed, Akhter U.; Hoddinott, John F.; Roy, Shalini;. 2012
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC; 2018
HarvestChoice, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2016
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI); Institut Supérieur Agronomique de Chott-Mariem . Washington, DC 2016
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2020
Upon request from USAID, IFPRI designed and conducted the US Global Food Security Strategy (GFSS) 2018/2019 baseline survey, which was implemented in the field from November 11, 2018 to February 6, 2019.
The GFSS 2018/2019 baseline survey covers mostly rural areas in the south and southwest region of the country. In addition to the 20 districts in three divisions that create the Feed the Future sample, the GFSS sample added Kushtia district in Khulna division based on its poverty and stunting trends. The 21 districts making up the GFSS are listed below:
1. Barishal division (six districts): Barguna, Barishal, Bhola, Jhalakati, Patuakhali, and Pirojpur;
2. Dhaka division (five districts): Faridpur, Gopalganj, Madaripur, Rajbari, and Shariatpur; and
3. Khulna division (10 districts): Bagerhat, Chuadanga, Jashore, Jhenaidah, Khulna, Kushtia, Magura, Meherpur, Narail, and Satkhira.
The GFSS sample includes 2,525 households in 125 primary sampling units (that is, villages). The GFSS sample design followed a stratified sampling in two stages: (1) randomly selected 125 PSUs (villages) with probability proportional to size (PPS) sampling using the number of households in each village as the size, and (2) after a complete census in each of the selected villages was conducted, randomly selected 20 households per PSU from the census list—using the sampling frame developed from the community series of the 2001 population census of Bangladesh.
Washington, D.C. 2004
Washington, D.C. 2005
Washington, D.C. 2005
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2019
The dataset consist of 178 farmers who irrigated at least one of their plots in 2017 season for growing either rice, maize, pepper or okra. It also includes information on various irrigation activities from the largest irrigated plot for each farm household. The information collected covers plot information, irrigation equipment / sources, inputs uses and outputs, irrigation adoption history, and household characteristics.
HarvestChoice, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2015
International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI). Washington, DC 2014
International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI). Washington, DC 2020
International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA). Washington, DC 2019
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2020
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2022
Data were collected using two separate questionnaires from both household heads and spouses. The household head questionnaire covered topics including household characteristics, assets, access to services, technology adoption, knowledge of agricultural practices, experience with video, crop sales, non-farm income, savings, food security, shocks, and plot-level information on land use, production, and inputs. The spouse questionnaire included sections on assets, technology adoption, knowledge of agricultural practices, and experience with video.
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2022
Data were collected using two separate questionnaires from both household heads and spouses. The household head questionnaire covered topics including household characteristics, assets, access to services, technology adoption, knowledge of agricultural practices, experience with video, crop sales, non-farm income, savings, food security, shocks, and plot-level information on land use, production, and inputs. The spouse questionnaire included sections on assets, technology adoption, knowledge of agricultural practices, and experience with video.
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2020
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2020
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2020
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2020
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2020
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2020
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2020
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2020
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2020
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2020
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2020
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2020
This dataset is the result of the household survey conducted to gather data for process evaluation in the context of an overall evaluation of the franchise model for Alive & Thrive (A&T) in Viet Nam. The overall aims of the evaluation were to assess the impact of the franchise model on (1) age-appropriate IYCF practices among children <2 years of age and (2) stunting among children 2-5 years of age. A&T is an initiative funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation to reduce undernutrition and death caused by suboptimal IYCF practices in three countries (Viet Nam, Bangladesh, and Ethiopia) over a period of six years (2009-2014). The goal of A&T is to reduce avoidable death and disability due to suboptimal IYCF in the developing world by increasing exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) until 6 months of age and reducing the stunting of children under two years of age. A&T applied principles of social franchising within the government health system to deliver the interventions. A&T’s Viet Nam strategy is designed to support improvements in infant and young child feeding (IYCF) in three key ways: (1) improving policy and regulatory environments; (2) shaping IYCF demand and practice; and (3) increasing supply, demand, and use of fortified complementary foods. In order to achieve this, the A&T Viet Nam program has been divided into three main focus areas namely advocacy, community, and the private sector. In addition, a communications component is integrated into each of these focus areas to support their activities. Among several activities, the franchise model is a core initiative of the community model to provide quality nutrition counseling to women and families at health facilities at all levels. Implemented in cooperation with the Vietnamese government and select private clinics, franchises will deliver a package of focused IYCF counseling services to pregnant women, lactating mothers, and their families, based on a franchise service package. Focused training and capacity building for healthcare workers will be undertaken to enable the health system to provide franchise services. Individualized services will be supported through mass media campaigns aimed at generating demand for franchise services and promoting optimal IYCF practices. The process evaluation survey was conducted in 40 communes across four provinces, Thai Nguyen, Thanh Hoa, Quang Ngai, and Vinh Long, between June and August 2013 by the IFPRI team in collaboration with the Institute of Social and Medicine Studies (ISMS). The survey included two components—(i) household survey, and (ii) frontline health workers survey. This household survey data provide information on the primary caretakers of children under two years of age (mothers, fathers, grandmothers) who are the beneficiaries of the program, in order to examine program exposure, utilization, and behavior change.
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2020
This dataset is the result of the frontline health workers survey conducted to gather data for process evaluation in the context of an overall evaluation of the franchise model for Alive & Thrive (A&T) in Viet Nam. The overall aims of the evaluation were to assess the impact of the franchise model on (1) age-appropriate IYCF practices among children <2 years of age and (2) stunting among children 2-5 years of age. A&T is an initiative funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation to reduce undernutrition and death caused by suboptimal IYCF practices in three countries (Viet Nam, Bangladesh, and Ethiopia) over a period of six years (2009-2014). The goal of A&T is to reduce avoidable death and disability due to suboptimal IYCF in the developing world by increasing exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) until 6 months of age and reducing the stunting of children under two years of age. A&T applied principles of social franchising within the government health system to deliver the interventions. A&T’s Viet Nam strategy is designed to support improvements in infant and young child feeding (IYCF) in three key ways: (1) improving policy and regulatory environments; (2) shaping IYCF demand and practice; and (3) increasing supply, demand, and use of fortified complementary foods. In order to achieve this, the A&T Viet Nam program has been divided into three main focus areas namely advocacy, community, and the private sector. In addition, a communications component is integrated into each of these focus areas to support their activities. Among several activities, the franchise model is a core initiative of the community model to provide quality nutrition counseling to women and families at health facilities at all levels. Implemented in cooperation with the Vietnamese government and select private clinics, franchises will deliver a package of focused IYCF counseling services to pregnant women, lactating mothers, and their families, based on a franchise service package. Focused training and capacity building for healthcare workers will be undertaken to enable the health system to provide franchise services. Individualized services will be supported through mass media campaigns aimed at generating demand for franchise services and promoting optimal IYCF practices. The process evaluation survey was conducted in 40 communes across four provinces, Thai Nguyen, Thanh Hoa, Quang Ngai, and Vinh Long, between June and August 2013 by the IFPRI team in collaboration with the Institute of Social and Medicine Studies (ISMS). The survey included two major components—(i) household survey, and (ii) frontline health workers survey. The survey of frontline health workers (FHWs) included questionnaires for commune health center (CHC) staff, village health workers (VHWs) involved in the A&T interventions, as well as a commune questionnaire. This observation of counseling services data is collected by trained researchers through observations of counseling sessions in order to assess the CHC health staffs' competence and performance during IYCF counseling. The counseling observation checklist was developed based on the IYCF service delivery package guidelines.
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2020
Washington, D.C. 2004
Department of Economics, University of Copenhagen; The World Bank; Central Institute for Economic Management (CIEM); International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Copenhagen, Denmark; Hanoi, Vietnam; Washington, DC 2014
2011
International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT); International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI). Washington, DC 2018
Wageningen University and Research (WUR); International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA). Washington, DC 2018
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI); Associates Research Uganda Limited (ARUL) . Washington, D.C. 2015
The WEAI measures the empowerment, agenc y, and inclusion of women in the agriculture sector in an effort to identify ways to overcome those obstacles and constraints. The Index is a significant innovation in its field and aims to increase understanding of the connections between women’s empowerment, food security, and agricultural growth.
The Uganda pilot covered five spatially dispersed rural districts in the northern region (Amuru and Kole), central region (Luwero and Masaka), and eastern region (Iganga).
The second pilot was conducted to develop and test a revised version of WEAI in the same districts as the original pilot. Sample villages were randomly assigned to receive either the original (1.1) or revised (2.0) versions of the questionnaire.
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI); Data Analysis and Technical Assistance, Ltd. (DATA) . Washington, D.C. 2015
Peterman, Amber; Quisumbing, Agnes R.; Meinzen-Dick, Ruth Suseela; Dardón, Monica; Hassan, Md. Zahidul; Kamusiime, Herbert; Malapit, Hazel J.. Washington, DC 2012
Peterman, Amber; Quisumbing, Agnes R.; Meinzen-Dick, Ruth Suseela; Dardón, Monica; Hassan, Md. Zahidul; Kamusiime, Herbert; Malapit, Hazel J.. Washington, DC 2012
The WEAI measures the empowerment, agency, and inclusion of women in the agriculture sector in an effort to identify ways to overcome those obstacles and constraints. The Index is a significant innovation in its field and aims to increase understanding of the connections between women’s empowerment, food security, and agricultural growth.
The Guatemala pilot was conducted in the country’s Western Highlands, in the departamentos (departments) of El Quiché, Huehuetenango, Quetzaltengo, San Marcos, and Totonicapán—areas with a high concentration of indigenous populations.
Peterman, Amber; Quisumbing, Agnes R.; Meinzen-Dick, Ruth Suseela; Dardón, Monica; Hassan, Md. Zahidul; Kamusiime, Herbert; Malapit, Hazel J.. Washington, DC 2012
The WEAI measures the empowerment, agency, and inclusion of women in the agriculture sector in an effort to identify ways to overcome those obstacles and constraints. The Index is a significant innovation in its field and aims to increase understanding of the connections between women’s empowerment, food security, and agricultural growth.
The Uganda pilot covered five spatially dispersed rural districts in the northern region (Amuru and Kole), central region (Luwero and Masaka), and eastern region (Iganga).
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI); University of Illinois. Washington, DC 2019
The objectives of the GFRAS study were to assess and provide empirical data on the current status of pluralistic extension systems worldwide for use in planning future efforts to modernize and strengthen these rural extensions and advisory services. The study focused on collecting useful empirical data on the human and financial resources of agricultural extension and advisory systems worldwide, as well as other important data and information, including:
the primary extension service providers in each country (e.g. public, private and/or non-governmental organizations);
which types and groups of farmers were the primary target groups (e.g. large, medium, and/or small-scale farmers, including rural women) for each extension organization;
how each organization’s resources were allocated to key extension and advisory service functions;
each organization’s information and communication technology resources and capacity; and
what role, if any, different categories of farmers played in setting extension’s priorities and/or assessing performance.
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI); Ministry of Planning and International Cooperation (MoPIC), Government of Yemen; Kiel Institute for the World Economy. Washington, DC 2014
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2020
In Ghana, mNutrition was implemented through the Vodafone Farmers Club (VFC) SMS program, and the service offered both agricultural and nutrition information through mobile voice and SMS services in addition to free calls between VFC members to improve the nutritional status of smallholder farmers’ households and to increase their agricultural productivity. To determine the causal effect of the program on dietary diversity and agricultural production, a cluster randomized encouragement design was employed to randomly expose treatment communities to promotional activities to sign up to VFC.
Household interviews were conducted before and after the intervention. Quantitative data-collection took place in the Central Region and Upper West Region of Ghana. At baseline, 3933 households from 207 communities (104 treatment and 103 control) were interviewed. Interviews were conducted with both primary male and female members of the household.
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2020
In Ghana, mNutrition was implemented through the Vodafone Farmers Club (VFC) SMS program, and the service offered both agricultural and nutrition information through mobile voice and SMS services in addition to free calls between VFC members to improve the nutritional status of smallholder farmers’ households and to increase their agricultural productivity. To determine the causal effect of the program on dietary diversity and agricultural production, a cluster randomized encouragement design was employed to randomly expose treatment communities to promotional activities to sign up to VFC.
Household interviews were conducted before and after the intervention. Quantitative data-collection took place in the Central Region and Upper West Region of Ghana. At baseline, 3933 households from 207 communities (104 treatment and 103 control) were interviewed. Of these 3933 households, 3802 households were interviewed at the endline. Interviews were conducted with both primary male and female members of the household.
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2020
In Tanzania, mNutrition was implemented through the ‘Healthy Pregnancy, Healthy Baby’ (HPHB) SMS program and the service offered free customized health and nutrition information through pregnant women, mothers with newborns, and male supporters to promote good health-seeking behavior and improve knowledge and practices around optimal childcare and nutrition. To determine the causal effect of the program on nutritional outcomes, a cluster randomized control design was employed to randomly assign recipients to receive the messages.
Household interviews were conducted before and after the intervention. Data collection was carried out in the three rural districts of the Iringa region: Iringa rural, Kilolo, and Mufindi. At baseline, 2833 households from 180 communities (90 treatment and 90 control) were interviewed. Interviews were conducted with both primary male and female members of the household. Among interviewees were 948 pregnant women and 1885 mother of a child under 12 months of age.
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2020
In Tanzania, mNutrition was implemented through the ‘Healthy Pregnancy, Healthy Baby’ (HPHB) SMS program and the service offered free customized health and nutrition information through pregnant women, mothers with newborns, and male supporters to promote good health-seeking behavior and improve knowledge and practices around optimal childcare and nutrition. To determine the causal effect of the program on nutritional outcomes, a cluster randomized control design was employed to randomly assign recipients to receive the messages.
Household interviews were conducted before and after the intervention. Data collection was carried out in the three rural districts of the Iringa region: Iringa rural, Kilolo, and Mufindi. At the endline, 2595 households were interviewed of the 2,833 households at baseline. Interviews were conducted with both primary male and female members of the household.